並列摘要
It seems to be widely accepted in academic circles that the natural law is a static, absolute kind of law that has no place in providing a foundation for human rights in the modern world . This paper challenges this assumption. It first presents the arguments of some such critics and then turns to theology 10 see if, in fact, God can indeed serve as a foundation of human rights. Finally, the paper takes a new look atthe natural law, not as portrayed by its critics, but as proposed by the scholastic tradition that is s till at work today. The argument presented here forms part of a broader monograph on the subject of the foundation of rights by the same author.
參考文獻
Hirsch, Emmanuel(ed.)(1984).Christianisme et droits de l'homme.Paris:Librairie des libertes.
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich(2005).Ethics.Minneapolis:Fortress.
Boucher, David(2009).The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Human Rights in Transition.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Cunningham, Lawrence S.(ed.)(2009).Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics.Notre Dame, Indiana:Notre Dame University Press.
Gunton, Colin E.(1993).The One, the Three and the Many: God, creation and the culture of modernity.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
延伸閱讀
- 陳愛娥（1997）。自由－平等－博愛－社會國原則與法治國原則的交互作用。臺大法學論叢，26(2)，121-141。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.1997.26.02.03
- 王俊斌（2007）。個體自由、群體權利與全球公民－論人權理念的發展與教育實踐。師大學報：教育類，52(1)，25-44。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200704.0002
- 李正治（1989）。科學、藝術與生命哲學。鵝湖月刊，(173)，57-57。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198911.0008
- 李正治（1987）。科學、藝術與生命哲學。鵝湖月刊，(145)，10-10。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198707.0003
- 任丑（2009）。作為普遍性道德權利的人權－應用倫理學視閾的人權理念。哲學與文化，36(7)，71-88。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.200907.0071