王弼與郭象仁義觀的比較研究

A Comparative Study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's Benevolence and Righteousness Theory

陳佩君(Pei-Chun Chen)

《哲學與文化》 40卷12期 (2013/12) Pp. 75-93

摘要

儒家主張仁義為名教的核心價值，在道家卻有「絕仁棄義」之批判，立場迴異。若欲調和儒道、消解自然與名教的衝突，如何通切地詮釋「仁義」，實為玄學家不能迴避的課題。本文先分別探討王弼與郭象的仁義觀與本體、人性、名教的關係，繼而解析其仁義概念的內涵，最後再就兩家的仁義觀進行綜合比較與評述。

關鍵字

王弼 ； 郭象 ； 仁義 ； 名教 ； 人性

並列摘要

While Confucianism regarded benevolence and righteousness as the essence of Confucian Ethical Codes, Daoism claimed ”abandon benevolence and discard righteousness.” In order to dissolve the conflict between Confucianism and Daoism, nature and Confucian Ethical Codes, Neo-Daoists need to find a proper approach to interpret the concept ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the first place, this paper studies Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory separately. First, inquire their thoughts about the relationships between ”benevolence and righteousness” and substance, human nature, and Confucian Ethical Codes. Second, analyze their definitions of ”benevolence and righteousness.” In the end, this paper makes a comparative study of Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's benevolence and righteousness theory.

並列關鍵字

Wang Bi ； Guo Xiang ； Benevolence and Righteousness ； Confucian Ethical Codes ； Human Nature

參考文獻

清焦循(1987)。孟子正義。北京:中華書局。

王叔岷(1978)。莊學管窺。臺北:藝文印書館。

王葆玹(1996)。玄學通論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。

牟宗三(1993)。才性與玄理。臺北:學生書局。

余敦康(2004)。魏晉玄學史。北京:北京大學出版社。