士林哲學視域與羅光的朱子學研究

現代朱子學研究視域多元，馬克思主義哲學與史學進路主要立足於歷史批判，錢穆、余英時從史學進路側重闡發歷史合理性及對當前文化街突之解決。牟宗三從康德哲學與心學進路入手解讀朱熹以推動儒學第三期發展，羅光從士林哲學視域的朱子學研究力圖將天主教哲學引入中國文化亦是現代朱子學研究之重要面向。通過系統方法和歷史方法的交錯運用，羅光對朱熹生生為仁的生命哲學體系、心性論和道德修養論有裨于士林哲學的補充價值給予高度的肯定，同時，羅光也立足於士林哲學立場從理氣二元論導致的矛盾、從本體論善惡產生的不足、對單體成因問題的無法解決以及絕對存有缺席造成的問題對朱熹哲學進行了指正。通過深入探究是光的朱子學研究與我們認識融通中西哲學的可能途徑、進而暸解創新中國哲學體系的具體範例，為推動中國當代哲學的自主性提供有效的思想借鑑。

關鍵字

士林哲學；羅光；朱熹；朱子學

並列摘要

The horizons for the modern study on Zhu Xi are pluralistic; while the Marxist and historical approaches are based on historical criticism, Chien Mu and Yu Ying-shih's historical approach is meant to explicate its historical rationality and solve contemporary cultural conflicts. Mo Zong-san approaches Zhu Xi through Kant's philosophy and the philosophy of mind to facilitate the further development of Confucianism, while Lo Kuang's scholastic approach, meaning to introduce Catholic philosophy into Chinese culture, is also an important dimension in the modern study of Zhu Xi. Alternating between the systematic and the historic methodologies, Lo Kuang strongly approved Zhu Xi's doctrine because his philosophical system of benevolence, theory of mind-nature and theory of moral cultivation are supplementary to scholastic philosophy. Based on scholasticism, Lo Kuang redressed the problems with Zhu's philosophy: the conflicts caused by the dichotomy of Ii and qi, the insufficiency of essence as the criterion of good and evil and the inability to solve the problem with the cause of the individual being. Exploring deeply Lo's study of Zhu Xi and the possible approaches to assimilate Chinese and western philosophies, we could see how to understand Chinese philosophical frameworks creatively and promote the autonomy of contemporary Chinese philosophy.