透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.193.129
  • 期刊

由機師族群探討國籍航空公司組織氣候及安全氣候與組員資源管理間之關聯性

Evaluation of the Correlation for Organizational Climate and Safety Climate within Crew Resource Management by Clusters of Pilot

摘要


本研究以問卷調查資料,從組織概念之觀點,探討國內航空公司不同背景機師是否在組識氣候、安全氣候與組員資源管理上存有文化差異,並由組織氣候及安全氣候尋求與組員資源管理間密切相關之因素,做為改善組員資源管理實施成效之依據。所得結論如下:1.組織氣候和安全氣候與組員資源管理間呈高度正相關;2.外籍機師較願表達本身意見及提出要求;自訓機師較軍轉機師會提出工作負荷分擔之要求;階級高、資深機師對於決策之質疑和要求分擔皆較主動;3.組織氣候愈正面如公平的升訓制度、支持回饋的態度以及開放性的內部溝通,機師組員資源管理的表現愈佳;且內部溝通愈自在,非懲罰性政策之推行也愈易;4.機師認為公司對於訓練的重視和講師教材素質方面有較佳表現,但不認為對安全給予適當的重視;資深、位高及年長之機師對非懲罰性政策認同度低。

並列摘要


Based on questionnaire survey data, this study took the approach of organizational conception to discuss Taiwanese pilots of different backgrounds whether they have cultural differences in the organizational climate, safety climate and Crew Resource Management or not, and to find the critical factors of organizational climate and safety climate that are highly correlated with CRM. The main findings were as follows: 1. Both organizational climate and safety climate had strong positive relationships with crew resource management; 2. Taiwanese pilots were less in expressing opinions and requests than foreign pilots. Civilian-trained pilots were more willing to request to share workloads than formerly military pilots. And, senior pilots were more active in querying requests and work assignments; 3. Under positive organizational climate (i.e., fair promotion, encourage feedback and open communication), the performance of CRM was better. Furthermore, non-punitive atmosphere would be easily created when the communication was good; 4. Pilots thought that Airlines have provided good training programs and lectures of good quality, but the airlines still need to reinforce safety. High-status and senior pilots do not value the non-punitive atmosphere.

參考文獻


蔡振昌(1997)。不同飛行員族群對航員資源管理訓練認知差異之研究。國立臺灣工業技術學院管理技術研究所企業管理學程。
宋建昇(2000)。不同飛行員群組在飛航工作的工作價值觀、工作特性對工作投入與工作滿意之研究。國立成功大學國際企業研究所。
Federal Aviation Administration(1998).Advisory Circular AC No. 120-51A. B. C. Crew Resource Management.
International Civil Aviation Organization(1989).Flight Crew Training: Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) and Line-oriented Flight Training (LOFT).
Helmreich, R. L.Merritt, A.Sherman, P.Gregorich, S.Wiener, E.(1993).The Flight Management Attitude Questionnaire.Austin, TX:University of Texas.

被引用紀錄


邱奕祥(2015)。探討飛航安全文化之交互作用〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500608
黃建興(2008)。航空公司機務維修人員與飛安風險關聯度之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2008.00016
鄭庭君(2016)。不同性別飛行員對組員資源管理認知與飛航安全之研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0301855
范曉寧(2007)。台北市醫學中心藥師對病人安全文化態度及其影響因素探討〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0007-2407200703204400

延伸閱讀