透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.231.36
  • 期刊

Vertical Separation and Collusion

垂直分割與勾結

摘要


This paper examines an integrated firm's incentive to undertake vertical separation with forward-looking behavior. In an infinitely repeated game we show that tacit collusion among firms in a final good market is more likely to be sustained under vertical separation than under vertical integration. The integrated firm tends to vertically separate its business if the discount factor is at a medium level and the input price is sufficiently low. Finally, an increase in the input price is socially beneficial if it prevents vertical separation.

並列摘要


本文探討當廠商的行為具前瞻性時,整合廠商從事垂直分割的誘因。利用一無限期重複賽局,我們發現相較於垂直整合,最終財市場的勾結在垂直分割的市場結構下較容易達成。當廠商的折現因子適中且中間財價格夠低時,此整合廠商將進行垂直分割。此外,如中間財價格的提高能有效阻止廠商進行垂直分割,則社會福利將隨中間財價格上升而增加。

並列關鍵字

垂直分割 觸發策略 勾結

參考文獻


Bonanno, G. and J. Vickers (1988), “Vertical Separation,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36:3, 257-265.
Chen, Y. (2005), “Vertical Disintegration,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14:1, 209-229.
Greenhut, M. L. and H. Ohta (1979), “Vertical Integration of Successive Oligopolists,” The American Economic Review, 69:1, 137-141.
Inderst, R. and T. Valletti (2009), “Price Discrimination in Input Markets,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 40:1, 1-19.
Lin, P. (2006), “Strategic Spin-offs of Input Divisions,” European Economic Review, 50:4, 977-993.

延伸閱讀