透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

菸價要調漲多少:菸品健康福利捐課徵對香菸消費的影響效果

Cigarette Price Hike: The Effect of Tobacco Health Welfare Tax on Cigarette Consumption

摘要


本研究主要目的在藉由香菸價格彈性估計來評估「菸品健康福利捐」課徵對香菸消費的影響效果。研究結果發現,進口香菸需求價格彈性為-0.807,國產香菸的需求價格彈性為-0.49,在每包菸品健康福利捐從原本的5元提高到10元,即每包菸品健康福利捐再調漲5元,在菸商反映成本上漲之下,若調漲每包香菸價格5元,將使國人平均每人國產香菸及進口香菸消費減少3.23包及4.86包,合計平均每人的香菸消費量減少8.09包,國人全部香菸消費量減少約1.48億包,可使菸品健康福利捐多增收90.5億元。在香菸價格要調漲多少部分,若要將國人的香菸消費量低於1998年世界的平均消費水準約為每人消費61包,則進口香菸及國產香菸每包必須分別調漲29元,才能使平均每人消費量減少46.93包,此時國人全部香菸消費量減少約8億6千萬包,平均每人香菸消費量減少44%。

並列摘要


The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a ”Tobacco Health Welfare Tax” on cigarette consumption through the estimation of cigarette price elasticities. It's found that the price elasticities for domestic and imported cigarettes, calculated at sample means, are -0.49 and -0.807. The raising of the health welfare tax from 5 NT$/pack to 10 NT$/pack is an increase of 5 NT$ per pack. Provided the cost reflection in the tobacco business is 5 NT$/pack, there would be a per capita decrease of 2.23 and 4.86 packs in domestic and imported cigarette consumption, respectively. That is, there would be a reduction of 8.09 packs per capita or 148-million pack decrease in cigarette consumption, resulting in additional tobacco health welfare tax revenue of NT$ 9.5 billion. To reduce the cigarette consumption of Taiwan below the world average, 61 packs per capita, and taking the consumption and retail price in 2004 as the base, there should be a price hike of NT$ 29/pack in imported and domestic cigarettes, respectively, to reduce total cigarette consumption by 46.93 packs per capita. Total cigarette consumption should be reduced by about 860 million packs, or a per capita cigarette consumption decrease of 44%.

參考文獻


Barten, A. t.(1967).Evidence on the Slutsky Conditions for Demand Equations.Review of Economics and Statistics.49,77-84.
Barten, A. t.(1969).Maximum Likelihood of a Complete System of Demand Equation.European Economic Review.1,7-72.
Barten, A. t.(1993).Consumer Allocation Model Choice of Functional Form.Empirical Economics.18,129-158.
Chaloupka, F. J.(1991).Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking.Journal of Political Economy.99(4),722-742.
Chaloupka, F. J., H. Wechsler(1997).Price, Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking among Young Adults.Journal of Health Economics.16,359-373.

被引用紀錄


陳令瑋(2008)。以管制治理分析台灣實施菸害防制政策之效果〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00699
陳麗如(2008)。菸品健康福利捐對目前吸菸者之戒菸想法及吸菸行為變化之影響探討-以台北市萬華區為例〔碩士論文,臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6831/TMU.2008.00068
黃雅靖(2009)。菸稅及貨物稅改革對公平與效率之影響評估〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2108200922131000
謝侑呈(2010)。抽菸或喝酒對勞動者薪資的影響〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0709201012252400
蔡志瑋(2012)。菸稅、走私量及菸品稅收〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2405201211585000

延伸閱讀