透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.82.167
  • 期刊

民主、資本主義與年金體系的發展:臺灣經驗的分析

Democracy, Capitalism and Pension Development in Taiwan

摘要


目前有關民主化與福利國家的研究過於強調兩者間的線性或是直接關係,忽略了民主化過程中,社會政策的發展係受制於既有的制度和體制結構,特別是資本主義體系結構。過去東亞福利國家的發展脈絡中,深受發展主義意識型態所影響,社會政策被視作從屬於經濟政策底下,進而限縮了國家對社會保障體系的制度選擇能力。基此,本文嘗試從政治經濟學的觀點,透過臺灣的歷史經驗分析,重新詮釋民主化對臺灣國民年金政策的影響,並說明國民年金如何在生產體制、社會政策制度遺緒和政治制度間的互動中,最終以小整合的樣貌出現。本文發現在出口導向的發展策略下,不僅形塑了臺灣零散的勞動市場體制,並且透過不同方式分化工會,限制勞工集體行動的力量。另一方面,以中小企業為主的生產體制,需透過壓低生產成本作為國際競爭的優勢基礎,因而壓抑非薪資勞動成本即成為國家考量的核心議題之一,進而限縮國家對於社會保障體系的制度選擇能力。其次,社會政策制度遺緒和政治制度之間的互動,強化了威權體制遺緒下的階級差別待遇,使得反對勢力得以運用短期性的津貼體系深化差別待遇,並以此作為爭取選民支持的策略。而此種針對特定族群的選舉策略,主要是出自於選舉制度的設計。這些因素顯示了制度選擇的結構性限制,讓國民年金體系的制度選擇限縮在分立式的路徑下,最終以小整合的路徑出現。

關鍵字

年金體系 民主化 生產體制 臺灣

並列摘要


Existing studies on the correlation between democracy and the welfare state tend to emphasize their linear or direct relationship. However, these studies ignore the fact that policy development in the process of democratic transition is conditioned by the institutional context and structure. In particular, in East Asia, the process of development is deeply shaped by the developmental state. Therefore, social policy is considered subordinate to economic policy, as the latter limits the state's capacity for institutional choice of social protection. This paper aims to reinterpret how democracy has affected the institutional choice of National Pension Insurance in Taiwan through a political economic perspective. We found on the one hand, that the developmental strategies in the, era of the authoritarian regime, reinforced the decentralisation of working classes; and on the other hand, social policy in the SMEs-dominated production regime was accented to promote labour market flexibility and, in turn, the issue of non-wage labour cost was highlighted. After democratisation, the interaction of social policy legacies and political institutions reinforced class differentiation, and the design of electoral institutions prompted politicians to propose an allowance scheme to vie for electoral support. This furthered the fragmentation of the Taiwanese pension system, and eventually, resulted in the fragmented National Pension Insurance.

參考文獻


中華民國全國商業總會 2007 〈勞委會主委王如玄拜會張平沼理事長〉。2012年4月29日,取自http://60.244.127.66/cgi-bin/big5/p1215/ae12?q1=v2&q2=p1215&q22=20080620165520&q10=1&q9=back&q11=1 (General Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of China, 2007, "The Minister of Council of Labor Affairs Jennifer Wang Calls on the Chairman Chang Pen-tsao," Retrieved April 29, 2012, from http://60.244.127.66/cgi-bin/big5/p1215/ae12?q1=v2&q2=p1215&q22=20080620165520&q10=1&q9=back&q11=1)
台灣向前行 2008 〈拼農業,好生活〉。2012年6月22日,取自 http://2008.ma19.net/news/20080203/15647 (Taiwan Moving Forward, 2008, "To Fight Agricultural, Good Life," Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://2008.ma19.net/news/20080203/15647)
台灣勞工陣線 2007 〈保障勞工經濟安全,許勞工一個永續經營的勞保年金〉。2012年6月22日,取自 http://labor.ngo.tw/news/n271206.htm (Taiwan Labour Front, 2007, "Protecting Economic Security of Labour, a Promise of a Sustainable Labour Insurance Pension," Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://labor.ngo.tw/news/n271206.htm)
立法院公報處(編) 2007 〈立法院第6屆第5會期衛生環境及社會福利、財政兩委員會第1次聯席會議紀錄〉,《立法院公報》96(49): 25-52。(Official Gazette Department, Legislative Yuan (ed.), 2007, "The Legislative Yuan 6th Tenure 5th Session Health Environment and Social Welfare, Finance Committees 1st Joint Meeting Record," The Legislative Yuan Gazette 96(49): 25–52.)
立法院公報處(編) 2007 〈國民年金法草案─完成三讀〉,《立法院公報》96(59): 181-208。(Official Gazette Department, Legislative Yuan (ed.), 2007, "National Pension Act Bill: The Third Reading," The Legislative Yuan Gazette 96(59): 181-208.)

被引用紀錄


吳興隆(2015)。社會政策之修訂:以我國勞工保險條例修正案為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00641
蔡英文(2013)。公平正義的實踐及其困境:比爾.霍尚維隆的福利國家理論政治科學論叢(57),1-34。https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.57(1-34)
蕭瓊玉(2016)。農保與國民年金保險脫勾政策制定過程之研究-多元流程觀點分析〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615104359

延伸閱讀