從效率與公平評估臺灣的大學入學制度改革

Evaluating Taiwan's Matriculation Reform from the Perspectives of Efficiency and Fairness

陶宏麟(Hung-lin Tao) ； 吳澤玫(Tse-mei Wu)

《人文及社會科學集刊》 31卷3期 (2019/09) Pp. 385-426

摘要

本文依據效率及效益主義、極端自由主義和羅爾斯社會正義論這三種道德理論的公平觀，評估民國73年以後的大學入學制度改革。73年的改革解除女性職涯限制及提升上大學機會，既增加媒合效率，也符合三種公平觀。83年後的多元入學制度減緩傳統聯考向家庭背景具優勢者傾斜的趨勢。繁星使低所得家庭及非都會區高中生更有機會進入理想大學，符合羅爾斯的公平觀；推甄、繁星與申請讓學生和校系直接自行配對，滿足極端自由主義的公平觀。三種入學管道的學生在穩定性、學業表現和學習滿意度都高於指考學生，顯示其提高了效率，且符合效益主義的公平觀。

關鍵字

大學入學 ； 效率 ； 效益主義 ； 極端自由主義 ； 羅爾斯社會正義論

並列摘要

This study evaluates Taiwan's matriculation reform after 1984 from the perspectives of efficiency and three conceptions of fairness in moral theory-utilitarianism, libertarianism, and Rawlsian social justice. The matriculation reform of 1984 removed limitations on women's career choices and enhanced women's opportunities to go to college. It also enhanced efficiency and satisfied all three conceptions of fairness. The Multiple Admission Program after 1994 mitigated the influence of family background in the traditional matriculation system. Multi-Star Admission enabled students in low-income families and nonmetropolitan schools to enter top colleges, satisfying Rawlsian social justice. The Admission via Recommendation, Multi-Star Admission, and Admission via Application programs allowed students to be paired with colleges according to their own wills directly, satisfying libertarianism. Students admitted by the Admission via Recommendation, Multi-Star Admission, and Admission via Application programs had high stability, grades and satisfaction. Accordingly, these three types of admission enhanced efficiency, which is in line with utilitarianism.

並列關鍵字

matriculation ； efficiency ； utilitarianism ； libertarianism ； Rawlsian social justice

參考文獻

大學入學考試試務委員會 1993 　《大學入學考試試務委員會82學年度工作報告》。基隆：國立臺灣海洋大學。(Joint Board of College Recruitment Commission, 1993, Annual Report of Joint Board of College Recruitment Commission 1993. Keelung: National Taiwan Ocean University.)

大學招生委員會聯合會 2017 　〈考招調整漸進來：107–110學年度怎麼改，這裡跟你說明白〉。2019年7月31日，取自http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/documents/others/1060725(%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%E4%B8%80%E5%AD%97)%20%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E5%A4%9A%E5%85%83%E5%85%A5%E5%AD%B8%E6%96%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E9%8A%9C%E6%8E%A5%E6%8E%AA%E6%96%BD%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.pdf (Joint Board of College Recruitment Commission, 2017, “Gradual Adjustment of College Admission System: Here Explain to You How 2018–2021 Changes,” Retrieved July 31, 2019, from http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/documents/others/1060725(%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%E4%B8%80%E5%AD%97)%20%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E5%A4%9A%E5%85%83%E5%85%A5%E5%AD%B8%E6%96%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E9%8A%9C%E6%8E%A5%E6%8E%AA%E6%96%BD%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.pdf)

王秀槐 2014 〈 多元入學制度下的教育機會均等 : 經由不同入學管道進入不同類型學校的大一學生家庭社經背景之研究 〉 , 《 市北教育學刊 》 47 : 21-46 。 ( Wang , Hsiou - huai , 2014 , "Equal Opportunities for College Access in the Multiple Admissions System: Types of Colleges Freshmen Entered & Their Family Socio-Economic Statuses," Journal of Edu- cation of University of Taipei 47: 21-46.)

王秀槐、黃金俊 2010 　〈擇其所愛、愛其所擇：從自我決定理論看大學多元入學制度中學生的科系選擇與學習成果〉，《教育科學研究期刊》55(2): 1–27。(Wang, Hsiou-huai and Chin-chun Huang, 2010, “The Application of Self-Determination Theory on Students’ Career Choice and Learning Outcomes under the Multiple College Admission System,” Journal of Research in Education Sciences 55(2): 1–27.)

田弘華、田芳華 2008 　〈大學多元入學制度下不同入學管道之大一新生特性比較〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》20(4): 481–511。(Tien, Hung-hua and Flora F. Tien, 2008, “Student Characteristics and Their Choices of College Entrance Channels,” Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy 20(4): 481–511.)