歷史社會學與國際關係理論的交會：歷史社會學的國家理論

The Interaction between Historical Sociology and Theories of International Relations: Theories of the State in Historical Sociology

余家哲(Hubert Chia-Che Yu) ； 李政鴻(Cheng-Hung Lee)

《政治科學論叢》 40期 (2009/06) Pp. 127-152

https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.40(127-152)

摘要

歷史社會學的國家理論發展，是一九七○年代與國際關係理論相會後逐漸發展的，共分成三波。第一波是重返國家理論，目的是將國家帶回理論研究，主張國家具有處於國際與國內的雙面性，特別是戰爭或危機發生時，會有強的國家自主性和職能性。第二波是多型態的國家理論，分析國家與社會的內部關係，理解國家權力的制度性來源，並認爲競爭的國際體系是有助於民族國家和現代國家的興起。第三波則是複合的國家理論，批判重返國家理論爲現實主義式的化約理論，認爲國家同時具有國內與國外的自主性，無論戰爭或危機是否出現，國家在與社會的互動和滲透中，產生了國家的自主性。透過這三波歷史社會學的國家理論，豐富了國家理論的內涵，並提供國際關係理論更廣的思考。

關鍵字

歷史社會學 ； 國家理論 ； 多型態國家 ； 複合國家論

並列摘要

From the 1970s, theories of the state in historical sociology arose from encounters with theories of international relations. Here we have three distinct waves of development. The first is the theory of ”bringing the state back in.” It argues the state has both international and domestic sides, and that the autonomy and capacity of the state are stronger specifically under conditions of war or crisis. The second is the theory of the ”polymorphous state”. It analyzes internal relations between state and society, and understands state power from institutional sources. In addition, the theory of the ”polymorphous state” explains how the competitive international system promoted the rise of the modern nation state. The third is the theory of the ”complex state”. It criticizes the theory of ”bringing the state back in” for realist reductionism. According to this theory, the state's autonomy comes from interactiveness and mutual infiltration between state and society. The state has both international and domestic autonomy simultaneously, regardless of whether there is a situation of war or crisis. In short, these three waves of theories in historical sociology enrich our knowledge of the state, and provide more space to think about international relations theory.

並列關鍵字

Historical Sociology ； Theories of the State ； Polymorphous State ； Complex State

參考文獻

Amsden, Alice H.,Peter B. Evans (eds.)(1985).Bringing the State Back.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Amsden, Alice H.,Wan-wen Chu(2003).Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.

Bull, Hedley,James Der Derian (ed.)(1995).International Theory: Critical Investigations.New York:New York University Press.

Colburn, Forrest D.(1988).Statism, Rationality, and State Centrism.Comparative Politics.20(4),485-492.

Evans, Peter B. (eds.),Dietrich Rueschemeyer (eds.),Theda Skocpol (eds.)(1985).Bringing the State Back.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.