社群媒體時代下政策企業家促進政策變遷之策略研析：臺灣的以核養綠公投為例

Strategies Employed by Policy Entrepreneurs to Promote Policy Change in the Era of Social Media: A Case Study of the ＂Go Green With Nuclear＂ Referendum in Taiwan

徐幸瑜(Hsin-yu Hsu)

《政治科學論叢》 83期 (2020/03) Pp. 101-148

https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.202003_(83).0003

摘要

政策企業家在政策變遷中的角色與重要性已獲得許多研究證實，但對於社群媒體時代的政策企業家如何推動政策變遷，常採取的策略為何？國內在此方面之研究仍有所不足。本文基於過去相關文獻，加以整理及簡化，建構一個簡潔明瞭的分類架構，將政策企業家常使用的策略分為四類，分別是：概念發展、展示與宣傳、建立聯盟及關係管理。本文以2018年臺灣以核養綠公投案作為研究案例，透過次級資料分析及深度訪談法，描繪政策企業家推動公投採取之策略，藉以檢視本架構之適用性。研究結果顯示，缺乏組織性人力與經費資源支持的公民個體政策企業家，在社群媒體發達的時代中，具有更多元的策略工具選擇，以推動政策改變；而政策企業家採取的策略類型，也確實符合本研究提出的策略架構。

關鍵字

政策企業家 ； 政策變遷 ； 公民投票 ； 以核養綠 ； 社群媒體

並列摘要

The importance of policy entrepreneurs on policy change has been confirmed by many studies. However, domestic research is insufficient regarding what strategies are adopted by policy entrepreneurs to promote policy change. Based upon related literature and references, this article organizes, simplifies, and constructs a clear and concise scheme to classify the strategies employed by policy entrepreneurs into four categories: idea development, demonstration and marketing, coalition building, and relationship management. Using the ＂Go Green with Nuclear Referendum in 2018＂ as a case study, this article analyzes these local policy entrepreneurs' strategies in Taiwan. Via secondary data analysis and in-depth interviews, this article describes strategies employed by local policy entrepreneurs who successfully promoted the referendum, and it examines the applicability of the above-mentioned scheme. The results show that in this peculiar era of social media, individual policy entrepreneurs without political power and resources can still effectively facilitate policy changes by employing diverse strategies, which are also consistent with the classification scheme proposed in this article.

並列關鍵字

Policy Entrepreneurs ； Policy Change ； ＂Go Green with Nuclear＂ ； Referendum ； Social Media

參考文獻

Frisch-Aviram N., N. Cohen., & I. Beeri. 2019. “Wind (ow) of Change: A Systematic Review of Policy Entrepreneurship Characteristics & Strategies.” Policy Studies Journal 0:1-33 (https://doi:10.1111/psj.12339).

以核養綠—缺電公民自救會，2018b，〈「以核養綠？以核養綠！」懶人包〉，網頁，https://reurl.cc/9jDzY，2019/08/12。Go Green with Nuclear― Self-help Group of Power Shortage Citizens. 2018b. “Yihe yanglu? yihe yanglu! Lanrenbao” [Go Green with Nuclear for Dummies]. in https://reurl.cc/9jDzY. Latest update 12 August 2019.

朱冠諭，2018，〈台大醫師書寫 13 萬字挺核四盼出書支持「以核養綠」公投〉，風傳媒網頁，https://www.storm.mg/article/486600?srcid=7777772e73746f726d2e6d675f33386336376166636261356139346633_1564562749，2018/09/05。Chu, Kuan-yu. 2018. “Taida yishi shuxie 13wan zi ting hesi pan chushu zhichi yihe yanglu gongtou” [Doctor of National Taiwan University Hospital Writes 130,000 Characters to Express Support for Constructing the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and Looking Forward to Publishing in Support of the “Go Green with Nuclear” Referendum]. in https://www.storm.mg/article/486600?srcid=7777772e73746f726d2e6d675f33386336376166636261356139346633_1564562749. Latest update 12 August 2019.

江飛宇，2018，〈「以核養綠」影響國際德國出現「核自豪」運動〉，中時電子報，https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181025004827-260408?chdtv，2018/10/25/。Jiang, Fei-yu. 2018. “Yihe yanglu yingxiang guoji deguo chuxian he zi hao yundong” [The “Go Green with Nuclear” Referendum Affects Germany to Organize the “Nuclear Pride Fest”]. in https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181025004827-260408?chdtv. Latest update 12 August 2019.

自由時報，2014，〈全國能源會議反核擁核爆口角〉，自由時報網頁，https://news. ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/840666，2014/12/21。Liberty Times Net. 2014. “Quan guoneng yuanhui yifan heyonghe baokou jiao” [Anti-nuclear Groups Have Words with Pro-nuclear Groups at the National Energy Conferences]. in https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/840666. Latest update 12 August 2019.