透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.115.195
  • 期刊

從典範轉移論惠棟之《周易本義辨證》

Hui Dong's "Zhouyi Benyi Bianzheng" as a Paradigm Shift

摘要


清乾嘉之學以「漢學」思潮為主流,惠棟(1697-1758)是推動典範轉移的關鍵人物。他有一系列《易》學著述,其中《周易本義辨證》成書較早,針對朱熹(1130-1200)《周易本義》加以辨析參證,表彰其「復古」,更旁通於「漢學」,藉此消解「宋學」之權威。以此為先導,其後《易漢學》、《周易述》乃正式為清代「漢學」之《易》學著述開山。

關鍵字

惠棟 《易》學 漢學 典範轉移 乾嘉之學

並列摘要


When the Qian-Jia School paradigm for study of the Classics formally turned towards Han Learning, Hui Dong was the key figure. His series of studies of the studies on the ”Yi” (易), including reconstructions, philology, phonology, led to his composition of new subcommentaries based on Han scholars' study of original meanings. The earliest of these, the ”Zhouyi Benyi Bianzheng” (周易本義辨證), was especially directed at questionable aspects of Zhu Xi's ”Yijing Ben Yi”, supported by additional references to put forth the idea of a return to antiquity to further the Han Learning movement. This attack on the established position of Song learning began a new direction in studies of the Yi. Subsequently, his ”Yi Hanxue” (易漢學) and ”Zhouyi Shu” (周易述) re-established the primacy of the Han Learning scholarship during the Qing.

參考文獻


宋朱熹(1983)。周易本義。臺北=Taipei:華正書局=Huazheng Books。
(2002)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
(2002)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
(1995)。續修四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
清翁方綱(1969)。復初齋文集。臺北縣:文海出版社。

被引用紀錄


羅聖堡(2017)。清初《易》圖論辨研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703005
莊民敬(2016)。惠棟與張惠言《易》學重探──「考古義」與「自為解釋」的雙重價值〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602164

延伸閱讀