透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.214.32
  • 期刊

析論楊簡、袁燮對《書序》、《詩序》之依違-南宋心學家對傳統經解態度的一個側面

To analyzing Yang-Jian and Yuan-Xie for their attitude of Shu-Xu and Shih-Xu- the southern Song Dynasty Heart-mind Theory scholars attitude of the traditional interpretation of the script

摘要


本文觀察陸九淵高足楊簡、袁燮對《書序》、《詩序》之依違,透過本文可以發現,在《尚書》方面,楊簡同意〈尚書序〉出自孔安國之手,但他直斥「孔安國不知道」。對於舊謂孔子所著的各篇〈小序〉,楊簡曾推測亦為孔安國所作,但在解經之時,楊簡依然依《書序》之內容以解經。在《詩經》方面,楊簡認定《詩序》出自漢儒衛宏之手,完全不能接受其說。袁燮的態度則又不同,他對於〈尚書序〉與《尚書孔傳》並無興致,但卻深信孔子創作百篇《書序》,又認為《詩序》「知道」,故願意接受《詩序》之詮釋。至此,吾人可知,心學家可以信守也可以揚棄傳統的解經成果,其中的關鍵就在傳統是否可以「知道」,而「知道」與否的判準主要還是由自己的主觀操控,也由此而讓心學家的解經成果出現同中有異的現象。

關鍵字

《書序》 《詩序》 心學家 楊簡 袁燮

並列摘要


This article observed the Lu Jiu-yuan's apprentice Yang-Jian and Yuan-Xie's attitude of Shu-Xu and Shih-Xu. Through this article, we could found, In Shang-shu, Yang-Jian agreed the "Shu-Xu" written by Kong An-Guo, but criticized him did not know doctrine. The old saying said the "Shu-Xu" written by Confucius, Yang-Jian was once speculated that was written by Kong An-Guo, even so, Yang-Jian still follow Shu-Xu 's explanation. But in Shih-Jing, Yang-Jian considerd the Shih-Xu was written by the Han Dynasty confucianism Wei Hong. Therefore, Yang-Jian unable to accept his point of view completely. Yuan-Xie's attitude was not quite the same. In regard to the "Shu-Xu" and Shang-Shu-Kong-Chuan , Yuan-Xie was not interested on it. But Yuan-Xie convinced that Confucius wrote hundreds of Shu-Xu, besides, Yuan-Xie considered the Shih-Xu know doctrine, therefore, Yuan-Xie was willing to accept Shih-Xu's point of view. In summary, we could know, the heart-mind theory scholars could accept or discard the traditional interpretation of the script, the sticking point is that traditonal interpretation whether know doctrine, the judgment criteria of these is according to personal subjective opinion, therefore, the interpretation of the classic results of the heart-mind theory scholars appearing the difference in the same on their results.

參考文獻


黃忠慎Huang Chungshen:〈心學與政治之間──袁燮《絜齋毛詩經筵講義》析論〉“Between the Mind Studies and the Politics: A Discussion on Yuan Xie's Interpretation of the Mao Poetry”,《臺大中文學報》Bulletin of The Department of Chinese Literature National Taiwan University第52期(2016年3月),頁95-134。
王晶Wang Jing、王淩皓Wang Linghao:〈南宋四大書院之教學藝術美〉“The Teaching Art Beauty in Four Academy of Classical Learning in Southern Song Dynasty”,《現代教育科學》Modern Education Science 2009年第6期(2009年6月),頁39-42。
王曉龍Wang Xiaolong、司學紅Si Xuehong:〈宋代書院教育〉“Academy Education in the Song Dynasty”,《河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Science)第32卷第4期(總第136期)(2007年7月),頁80-82。
李承貴Li Chenggui、賴虹Lai Hong:〈論楊簡的儒學觀〉“Yang Jian's View of Confucianism”,《南昌大學學報(社會科學版)》Journal of Nanchang University (Social Science)第28卷第1期(1997年3月),頁9-16。
李振興Li Zhenxing:〈尚書大、小序辨疑〉“The Discussion of Shang Shu Da Xu and Xiao Xu”,《尚書流衍及大義探討》Shang Shu Liu Yan ji Da Yi Tan Tao(臺北Tapei:文史哲出版社The Liberal Arts Press,1982年),頁77-86。

延伸閱讀