論明末以儒義融通三教之心體觀－以王龍溪與林兆恩爲例

On the Views of Xin Ti (心體) Were Based on Confucian Thought to Merge with Buddhism and Taoism by Wang Long-xi (王龍溪) and Lin Chao-en (林兆恩) in the Late Ming Dynasty

唐經欽(Jing-Ching Tang)

《鵝湖學誌》 44期 (2010/06) Pp. 85-133

https://doi.org/10.29653/LS.201006.0003

摘要

中晚明三教融通思潮波濤洶湧，在當時已為各教思想家不容忽視之議題，然各思想家融通之進路卻又分別持一己之定見為主體，其中，王龍溪與林兆恩皆受陽明思想影響，且兩者之三教觀明顯站在儒家本位以融攝佛道，然兩者不論是主「良知範圍三教」或「三教合一」思想，皆涉及合一或融攝之義理基礎問題，故本文擬探討王龍溪與林兆恩之良知心體觀，並針對其體用觀及虛寂性作比較研究，以釐清清兩者同異之旨，籍以呈顯秉儒義融通三教心體觀之不同樣貌。

關鍵字

王龍溪 ； 林兆恩 ； 良知 ； 心體 ； 三教

並列摘要

The thinkers nearly didn't permit to neglect the topic during the climax of Three-in-one Doctrine in middle-and-late-periods of Ming Dynasty. But the thinkers follow their religious ideas in merging way. Both Wang Long-xi (王龍溪) and Lin Chao-en (林兆恩) were affected by the thought of Wang Yang-ming. Their views of Three-Doctrine were based on Confucian thought to merge with Buddhism and Taoism. However, no matter it wan the Three-Doctrine to be included in conscience in Wang Long-xi's theory, or the Three-in-one Doctrine of Lin Chao-en's theory, both referred to the foundation of mergence. So I will research the conscious views between Wang Long-xi and Lin Chao-en. Also I will compare the views of ”ti yong (體用)” and ”xu ji” (虛寂) to distinguish their same and different opinions. By way of the comparison, I will display the multiples based on Confucian thought to merge with Buddhism and Taoism.

並列關鍵字

Wang Long-xi ； Lin Chao-en ； conscience ； xin ti ； Three-Doctrine

參考文獻

宋張載(1979)。張子全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

宋程顥、宋程頤(1983)。二程集。臺北:漢京出版社。

宋朱熹(1996)。四書章句集註。臺北:鵝湖出版社。

宋．朱熹，《晦庵先生朱文公文集》，上海：中華書局排印本，四部備要叢書，1936。

明王守仁(1985)。王文成公全書。臺北:中華書局。