探析《道教義樞》中「有、無」的思想意義

Analysis the Philosophy Significance of "Being and Non-Being" in "Tao-Chiao I-shu"

廖雅慧(Ya-Huei Liao)

《中國學術年刊》 36_1期 (2014/03) Pp. 23-44

https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.201403.02

摘要

本文聚焦於《道教義樞》中「有、無」思想，《道教義樞》所載的是從南北朝至隋、唐初的道教教義內容，因此旨在研究此中道教「有、無」的思想意義。從道教受魏晉玄學的影響與佛教興起的衝擊之下，探討唐初道教對「有、無」思想意義的詮釋，以及「有、無」與佛學的聯繫，乃至「有、無」論證所表現的重玄思維，並且以「體用」言「有、無」。如此可了解《道教義樞》站在道教的立場去融通或消化魏晉玄學與佛學，將思想內化於「有、無」教義的建構過程，並且作出回應或反動，見其思想理路的交涉，以及強化道教教義的企求，乃至宗教實踐中教義宣揚所重視的言教層面，一一於「有、無」之間展現。

關鍵字

《道教義樞》 ； 有 ； 無 ； 有無之名 ； 體用

並列摘要

This article is focus on the significance of ”being and non-being” in '.”Tao-chiao I-shu” include the Taoist doctrine from North-South dynasties to early stage of Sui and Tang dynasties, therefore, here focus on the significance of ”being and non-being”. From the influenced by Wei-Jin metaphysics and the impact of the raising Buddhism to analysis how Tao-chiao in early stage of Tang dynasties to annotate ”being and non-being” as well as the connection between ”being and non-being” and ”Buddhism” and the present of heavy metaphysics thought from ”being and non-being” and to explain ”being and non-being” with substance and function. Therefore, we can analysis how ”Tao-chiao I-shu” based on Tao-chiao standpoint to harmoniously digest Wei-Jin metaphysics and Buddhism and to go through the construction process of internalizes the thought in ”being and non-being” Taoist doctrine. And take further reaction and feedback to see the interaction of its intrinsic principle, as well as the desire to strengthened Taoist doctrine. The word teaching witch is the most value of doctrine publicizes in religion practice evenly and clearly present in between ”being and non-being”.

並列關鍵字

"Tao-chiao I-shu" ； being ； non-being ； the name of being and non-being ； substance and function

參考文獻

勞思光：《新編中國哲學（一）》（臺北：三民書局，1984年）。

周芳敏：〈王弼「體用」義銓定〉，《台灣東亞文明研究學刊》第6卷第1期，（2009年6月），頁161-201。

胡勇：〈有無、本末與體用：王弼經典詮釋中的哲學創造〉，《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》第44期，（2012年10月），頁149-194。