透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.218.146
  • 期刊

實施造市機制對台灣權證市場品質之影響

The Impact of the Implementation of Market Maker Mechanism on the Quality of theTaiwan Warrants Market

摘要


本研究評估台灣權證市場實施造市機制對市場品質之影響。我們以兩年樣本期間之1萬2千檔權證,1千6百萬筆日內交易資料進行實證。所得結果為:1.實施造市機制對提升臺灣權證市場品質具有正面功能。在未控制攸關變數下之實證結果為:價差減少63%,深度增加231%,價格衝擊減少65%,波動性與效率性沒有顯著變化;在控制權證屬性、權證發行券商屬性、權證標的股屬性及市場攸關變數後,所得之結果為:價差顯著降低,深度顯著增加,價格衝擊減少,波動性與效率性之變動方向不明顯。2.對具有下列屬性之權證實施造市機制成效較佳:認售、美式之權證;規模較小、發行量較少之券商所發行的權證;標的股之成交量較少、市場品質較佳、較常被當標的股的權證。3.實施造市機制對不須造市之權證具有降低價差、增加深度之效果。

並列摘要


This study aims to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the market maker mechanism on the market quality of the Taiwan warrants market. The sample period is between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2011 and the samples consist of 12,000 warrants and 16 million intraday transaction data. The findings are as follows. First, the implementation of the market makers mechanism has a positive effect on the market quality of the Taiwan warrants market: the new mechanism, before considering control variables, produces 63% decrease in spread, 231% increase in depth, and 65% decrease in price impact, but it has no significant improvement both in volatility and efficiency. If we control the attributes of the warrants, those of the warrant issuers, those of the underlying stocks, and other vital market variables, respectively, the market quality is still found to have significant improvements: lower spread, increased depth, and reduced price impact, but there is still no significant improvement both in volatility and efficiency. Second, due to the implementation of the market maker mechanism, the most significant improvements in market quality are mostly found in those warrants, which are put and American style, issued by securities firms with smaller size, or with smaller issuance. If the underlying stocks of the warrants are thinly-traded, with better market quality, or more popular among warrant issuers, these warrants are also found to have better improvements in the market quality attributed to the new mechanism. Finally, interestingly and strikingly, the implementation of market maker mechanism also reduces the spread, and increases the depth, for those warrants, which are issued before the implementation date of the new mechanism and thus with no market-making requirements.

參考文獻


馬黛、廖怡玲(2000),「交易時間、交易行為與股市績效:台灣股市隔週休二日之實證」,《財務金融學刊》,第8卷第3期,79-105。
黃玉娟、林明白(2003),「買賣單不平衡、價差和報酬之探討:以台指期貨在台灣期貨交易所及新加坡交易所為例」,《財務金融學刊》,第11卷第2期,71-98。
黃彥聖、姜清海、柯美珠(2000),「漲跌幅限制下均衡價格的估計與過度反應假說之檢定」,《財務金融學刊》,第7卷第3期,27-59。
詹場、池祥麟(2013),「臺灣券商發行之權證市場品質及造市績效評比」,《台大管理論叢》,即將出版。
劉玉珍、周行一、潘璟靜(1996),「台灣股市價格限制與交易行為」,《中國財務學刊》,第4卷第2期,41-60。

被引用紀錄


陳俞君(2015)。臺灣權證流動性對波動性與價差之影響-以牛熊證為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00848
謝家瑋(2015)。實施現股當日沖銷制度對臺灣股票市場品質之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00481
陳尹容(2016)。台灣牛熊證市場之券商定價行為與觸價強制收回事件〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600424

延伸閱讀