台灣牛熊證市場之券商定價行為與觸價強制收回事件

牛熊證的特性與一般權證最大的不同即在於契約中所規定的觸價強制收回機制，一般認為，觸價收回機制是對投資人的一種保護機制；然而，由於牛熊證的定價中，財務費用包含預收的時間價值，如果提早觸價，將造成損失投資人，且財務費用越高，投資人損失也越多。本研究動機主要在探討，券商是否能藉由將牛(熊)證的觸價訂的高(低)一點，讓強制回收事件更容易發生，因此增加報酬。本研究利用迴歸模型分析的實證發現：一、券商於牛熊證契約訂定上，傾向讓高財務費用牛熊證的限制價貼近市價，使MCE事件較易發生。二、高財務費用的牛熊證較易發生MCE事件。三、牛熊證市場上有主導優勢的券商傾向於使牛熊證較易發生MCE事件。

關鍵字

牛熊證；觸價強制收回事件；財務費用

並列摘要

Callable bull/bear contract is different from warrant with the mandatory call mechanism. It is generally recognized that the mandatory call mechanism is a kind of protection to investors. However, when the callable bull/bear contract expired early, investors also lose the time value of the funding cost. Moreover, if the funding cost is higher, investors will lose more. Thus, the thesis aims to find if the securities companies really set the call price close to price of the underlying asset, so the MCE will occur easily, and the securities companies increase their profits. The empirical results show that the callable bull/bear contract with higher funding cost tends to have a call price close to price of the underlying asset. Second, the callable bull/bear contract of higher funding cost is more likely to have MCE. Third, the dominant securities companies tend to set a call price close to price of the underlying asset, which means the MCE may occur more easily.

並列關鍵字

Callable Bull/Bear Contracts ； Mandatory Call Event ； Funding Cost

參考文獻

10. 詹場、胡星陽、池祥麟、葉鴻志、徐崇閔，2013，＜實施造市機制對台灣權證市場品質之影響＞，《證券市場發展季刊》，25卷4期，頁1 - 66

8. 陳溢茂、林師模、黃健銘、廖汶釗，2013，＜開放以黃金為權證/牛熊證標的之可行性研究＞，中華民國證券商業同業公會委託研究

9. 陳俞君，2015，＜台灣權證流動性對波動性與價差之影響-以牛熊證為例＞，碩士論文

11. Adrian c. H. Lei (2015), Price and Volume Effects of Exchange‐Traded Barrier Options: Evidence From Callable Bull/Bear Contracts, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 35, No. 11, 1042–1066

13. Cheung, Cheung, He, and Wan (2010), A trading strategy based on Callable Bull/Bear Contracts, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18, 186–198

國際替代計量

台灣牛熊證市場之券商定價行為與觸價強制收回事件

主題瀏覽