This study examines whether political connections influence a bank's performance and/or risk-taking. The result affirms that CEOs of politically connected banks have no influence on bank performance or risk-taking, which could instead be explained by CEO power and board structures. Rent seeking, allies on the board, professional directors, and a gender-diversified board may balance out the marginal benefits and costs of political connections. This study also corroborates that the effect of political ties is subject to CEO power. Banks with politically connected CEOs who have considerable ownership power exhibit good performance and low risks, which supports "development theory." Politically connected CEOs with strong expert power demonstrate rent seeking behaviors, which supports "political theory."