價值、動能投資與崩盤風險：台灣股票市場的實證

Value, Momentum, and Crash Risk in the Taiwan Stock Market

劉信陸(Hsin-Lu Liu) ； 柯冠成(Kuan-Cheng Ko) ； 林宜楨(Yi-Jhen Lin) ； 羅文綺(Wen-Chi Lo)

《中山管理評論》 31卷2期 (2023/06) Pp. 283-307

https://doi.org/10.6160/SYSMR.202306_31(2).0002

摘要

過去文獻普遍指出傳統的價值與動能策略在台灣市場並不具有獲利性，本文為首篇檢驗此二交易策略的崩盤風險之研究，俾提供此二交易策略缺乏有效性之可能原因。在1982年7月至2015年12月的樣本期間內，實證結果發現此二策略在台灣市場皆存在極端的異常損失。然而，此二現象在時間序列上的暴險程度並不相同，符合Asness et al.（2013）提出價值與動能存在互補效果之論點。我們進一步檢驗Asness et al.（2013）所提出之價值與動能簡單合併策略之獲利性，發現此合併策略並無法提升獲利性，在運用Daniel & Moskowitz（2016）的動態風險權重調整下，則可提升獲利性並降低崩盤風險。本文之結果凸顯動態的風險管理對運用交易策略於台灣市場之必要性。

關鍵字

價值投資 ； 動能投資 ； 崩盤風險 ； 動態權重調整

並列摘要

While value and momentum are prevalent and pervasive strategies in U.S. and major markets, their unprofitability in the Taiwan stock market has been widely documented in the literature. To provide a plausible explanation for the absence of the two strategies, we examine the crash risk for both strategies. The evidence indicates that value and momentum both experienced severe crashes from July 1982 to December 2015. However, they exhibit different patterns in time-series exposure to crash risk, indicating that their return patterns are negatively correlated. We accordingly follow Asness et al. (2013) to examine whether a 50-50 combined strategy that invests in both value and momentum generates significant profitability. The answer is negative. Applying Daniel & Moskowitz's (2016) dynamic weighting approach, we show that the combined strategy becomes remarkably profitable and is not subject to crash risk during panic periods. Our results highlight the importance of dynamic risk management to trading strategies in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

Value Investing ； Momentum Investing ； Crash Risk ； Dynamic Weighting Adjustment

參考文獻

方智強、姚明慶，1998，「台灣上市公司的淨值市價比現象」，管理學報，10 卷 3 期：367～391。(Fang, C.-C. and Yau, M.-C., 1998, “The Book-to-market Phenomenon in Taiwan,” Journal of Management and Business Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 367-391.)

王麗惠、郭憲章、吳壽山，2009，「公司報酬演化階段與市價淨值比溢酬現象之探討」，證券市場發展季刊，21 卷 3 期：1～24。(Wang, L.-H., Kuo, H.-C., and Wu, S., 2009, “The Link between Return-stages Valuation and Price-to-book Ratio Anomaly,” Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1-24.)

李春安，1999，「後見之明心理與股市反應不足，過度反應理論」，中國財務學刊，7 卷1 期：17～58。(Li, C.-A., 1999, “A Model of Hindsight, and Security Market Underreaction/ Overreaction,” Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, 17-58.)

李春安、羅進水、蘇永裕，2006，「動能策略報酬、投資人情緒與景氣循環之研究」，財務金融學刊，14 卷 2 期：73～109。(Li, C.-A., Luo, J.-S., and Su, Y.-Y., 2006, “Momentum Returns, Investor Sentiments and Business Cycle,” Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 73-109.)

周賓凰、劉怡芬，2000，「臺灣股市橫斷面報酬率解釋因子：特徵、單因子、或多因子」，證券市場發展季刊，12 卷 1 期：1～32。(Chou, P.-H. and Liu, Y.-F., 2000, “The Cross Section of Expected Returns in Taiwan: Characteristics, Single Factor, or Multi Factors?” Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-32.)