透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.60.149
  • 期刊

「以莊解莊」論在《莊子》詮釋傳統中的反思與承變

Reflections and Changes in the Theory of "Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi" in the Interpretation Tradition of Zhuangzi

摘要


「以莊解莊」論是《莊子》詮釋傳統中即有的原生性詮釋觀念,其脈絡意義也可能蘊涵了三個層面的差異與考慮:其一,「提出論說者」(常常有他序者提出之情形)與「實際詮釋者」之間的立場異同問題。其二,「以莊」之「莊」是指什麼樣的解釋基礎?是「以《莊子》文獻的解讀為解釋的基礎」?還是「以《莊子》義理的體悟為解釋的基礎」?抑或是指兩者之間具有辯證的關係問題?其三,「解莊」之「莊」是指什麼樣的目的取向?是「以《莊子》文獻之語言解讀為目的」?還是「以《莊子》義理的存在實踐為目的」?抑或是指兩者之間有辯證或者側重的關係問題?因此,筆者撰寫本文的目的,主要是希望將「以莊解莊」論重新置於《莊子》詮釋傳統中的個別情境加以討論,一方面顯化個別「以莊解莊」論在各自《莊子》詮釋情境中的反思;另一方面分析出歷來「以莊解莊」論之相關內涵在《莊子》詮釋傳統中的承繼與通變。總之,「以莊解莊」論之具體內涵從作者之方法與目的、經典文本之表達方式、到詮釋者之存在情境與實踐,以及詮釋傳統之承繼與創變等影響因素皆有所涉及。因此,「以莊解莊」論在《莊子》詮釋傳統中的反思,實無法直接等同於回歸經典大義或作者本意的觀點,而其中涉及的多元因素與豐富的內涵,也足可作為當代《莊子》詮釋者更為深廣的思考,及其開創《莊子》之當代意義時的方法學反思與抉擇。

並列摘要


The theory of "Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi" is the concept of original interpretation in Zhuangzi's interpretation tradition. Its contextual meaning may also contain three levels of differences and considerations: First, "Person making a point" (often presented by others) The issue of the similarities and differences between the situation proposed by the person and the "actual interpreter". Second, what kind of explanation basis is the "Zhuangzi" of "Using Zhuangzi"? Is "the basis for the interpretation of the Zhuangzi literature as an explanation?" Or is it based on the understanding of the theory of Zhuangzi? Or does it mean a dialectical relationship between the two? Third, what kind of purpose orientation does "Zhuangzi" in "Explain Zhuangzi" mean? Is "for the purpose of reading the language of the Zhuangzi?" Or is it "for the purpose of the existence and practice of Zhuangzi?" Or does it mean a dialectical or focused relationship between the two? Therefore, the author's purpose in writing this paper is mainly to discuss the individual situations in which the "Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi" theory is re-positioned in the interpretation tradition of Zhuangzi. On the one hand, the individual " Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi " theory is manifested in their respective interpretation situations. Reflection on the other side; on the other hand, it analyzes the inheritance and change of the traditional " Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi " theory in the interpretation tradition of Zhuangzi. In short, the specific connotation of the " Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi " theory is related to the influencing factors such as the method and purpose of the author, the expression of the classical text, the existence and practice of the interpreter, and the inheritance and innovation of the interpretation of tradition. Therefore, the reflection of "Using Zhuangzi to explain Zhuangzi" in the interpretation tradition of Zhuangzi can not be directly equated with the idea of returning to the classic meaning or the author's original intention, and the plural factors and rich connotations involved in it can also be regarded as contemporary. Zhuangzi's interpreters have deeper and broader thinking, and their methodological reflections and choices when creating the contemporary meaning of Zhuangzi.

參考文獻


(2011)。子藏.道家部.莊子卷。北京:國家圖書館。
(2011)。子藏.道家部.莊子卷。北京:國家圖書館。
宋呂惠卿、湯君集校(2009)。莊子義集校。北京:中華書局。
宋林希逸、周啟成校注(2009)。莊子鬳齋口義校注。北京:中華書局。
宋褚伯秀、張京華點校(2014)。南華真經義海纂微。上海:華東師範大學出版社。

延伸閱讀