- 期刊
陸機〈文賦〉新詮－從對讀陸雲〈與兄平原書〉為詮釋進路，兼論〈文賦〉的「以賦論文」體制
A New Interpretation of Lu Ji's ＂Wen Fu＂: An Interpretation Approach from Comparison with Lu Yun's ＂Yu Xiong Ping Yuan Shu＂ and Study of ＂Writing Discussion by Fu＂ of ＂Wen Fu＂
摘要
近世學者多視〈文賦〉為古典文學批評鉅構，是文學理論批評史上第一篇系統地論述文學創作問題的重要著作，對於〈文賦〉在中國文學批評史上的地位，給予極大肯定。然而，與陸機同時期或稍後的文人卻言其「不清」、「碎亂」、「無貶」，如此兩極化的評價，至今鮮為人注意。職此，本文首先借由闡釋〈文賦〉通篇之義，以判別與陸機同時期或稍後的文人對〈文賦〉的批評是否恰當。其次仔細對讀〈文賦〉最初讀者陸雲的〈與兄平原書〉，從中鉤索陸機的寫作動機，進而揭示〈文賦〉一文乃陸氏昆仲往來論難的成果記錄。最後梳理〈文賦〉中涉及的玄學議題，指出〈文賦〉儼然是陸機與陸雲「筆談」的清談記錄，並透過分析嵇康〈琴賦〉、瘐敳〈意賦〉與清談的關係，說明〈文賦〉「以賦論文」的形式，在當時的語境中並無所謂得體或不得體的爭議。
並列摘要
Contemporary scholars mostly treated Essay on Literature (Wen Fu) as significant criticism of classical literature and it was the first book with systematic discussion of literature creation in literary theory criticism history. It considerably recognizes the position of Essay on Literature in Chinese literary criticism history. Nevertheless, the literati in the same period of Lu Ji or the later generation argued it as ＂unclear＂ and ＂disordered＂ work. The opposing comments have not been noticed. Based on previous issue, this study first interprets the general meanings of Essay on Literature in order to justify the comments of the literati in the same period of Lu Ji or the later generation on Essay on Literature. Secondly, it carefully examines A Prose-style Letter to Brother Pingyuan (Yu Xiong Ping Yuan Shu) of Lu Yun, the earliest reader of Essay on Literature to recognize the writing motivation of Lu Ji in order to find the reason why Essay on Literature was criticized as a disordered work. Furthermore, it reveals that the article Essay on Literature is the result record of the debate of Lu Ji brothers.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 林玟君（2016）。陸柬之書陸機〈文賦〉研究〔碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203607
- 游志誠（1993）。舊詩詮釋學之一論－兼評顏崑陽《李商隱詩箋釋方法論》。中外文學，21(11)，82-116。https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.1993.21(11).82-116
- 梁家興（2021）。《文心雕龍．詮賦》不述曹植賦發微。輔大中研所學刊，(42)，329-353。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15610454-202111-202205050014-202205050014-329-353
- 詹詠翔（2020）。Two Interpretation Paradigms of Chu Ci Studies in Qing Dynasty : The Exgesis of Wang Fu Zhi's The General Studies in Chu Ci and Dai Zhen's The interpretation of Qu Yuan's Fu as the research objects。東吳中文線上學術論文，(52)，23-53。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20750404-202012-202101080010-202101080010-23-53
- 黃崇修（2020）。The Practical Significance of Cheng Yi's Concept of ＂Yi and Li＂: Interpreting ＂Cultivation of Qi and Accumulation of Yi＂ from the Perspective of the Heaven-Man Relationship。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，(60)，47-86。https://doi.org/10.6276/NTUPR.202010_(60).0002