透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.0.53
  • 期刊

雙胞胎或連體嬰:論安全研究與和平研究之關聯性

Fraternal Twins or Siamese Twins? On the Relationship between the Security Study and Peace Study

摘要


安全研究是國際關係領域的主要核心研究之一,它與國際關係理論的發展有密切關聯性,同時具有跨學科的性質,不僅包括歷史、經濟、文化和心理等方面內涵,還囊括軍事、政治、法律等層面之內容。而和平研究則作為國際關係的另一領域,一方面汲取其他領域的研究成果並與之有所重疊,例如法學、哲學、心理學、人類學、政治學等;一方面與其他學科在和平與衝突議題上,又有著迥異的差別,強調國家間合作之重要性。 本文主要探討安全研究與和平研究兩者間的關聯性,透過檢視兩者在發展歷程上的演變、定義的界說、保障安全與達到和平之方式,指出安全研究與和平研究之間的關係時而如同雙胞胎,時而如同連體嬰;本文經由研究發現,安全研究與和平研究兩者間的關聯性在早期與現代是有區別。從僅是本質相似但仍各自有別的雙胞胎關係,發展到目前難以斷然分割的連體嬰關係,同時彼此還「共享」與「共有」許多研究基礎和分析成果。鑒於安全受到破壞則和平將無以維繫,安全研究乃為和平研究發展之基礎,本文主張將和平研究置於安全研究之中,讓兩者間的關聯性判定為是連體嬰。

並列摘要


The study of security is central to the study of international relations; it has deep relations with the development of international relations theory. Being Inter-disciplinary in nature, security study not only encompasses the historical, economic, cultural, and psychological dimensions, but includes the military, political, legal, and technological components. Contrasting with peace studies, it overlappes with or draws inspiration from a varied fields of study, such as jurisprudence, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, politics, but was distinguished from them by its central emphasis with the issue of peace and conflict. The main purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the security studies and peace studies. The authors argue that the connection between the security studies and peace studies is like siamese twins during certain times and just like fraternal twins during other times. The authors analyze the evolution of security studies and peace studies, the concepts of security and peace, the meanings of security and peace, the strong interrelationship and suggest a framework for achieving security and peace. Pointing out the distinguishable twin-like features that the security and peace studies were thought to have, the authors argue the emergence of a new era in research where the two fields exhibit the embedded relationship and common destiny features of Siamese Twins. In the new thinking, the authors argue, Security Studies encompasses peace studies and security without peace or vice versa is futile.

參考文獻


王從恕(2001)。西方環境倫理概要。科學教育月刊。241,26-34。
林碧炤()。
林碧炤(2001)。信心建立措施的理論與實際。台北:台綜院。
郭承天(1996)。國際建制與國際組織。台北:時英出版社。
孫效智(2001)。蘇菲的抉擇?-分割連體嬰的倫理難題。哲學與文化。28(5),406-439。

被引用紀錄


黃立方(2015)。中國對台經濟安全戰略之研究-以平潭島綜合實驗區為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00294
黃筠凱(2009)。歐盟和東協之安全與警政合作〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.00432
許偉君(2009)。哥倫比亞和平進程之研究:游擊隊活動對哥倫比亞國家與區域安全之影響及政府政策(1998-2008)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.00051
劉川語(2011)。全球化下新興傳染病對人類安全的威脅: 以H1N1為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613495024
張鈺欣(2012)。非傳統安全因素下的日中關係:以東日本大震災為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613512166

延伸閱讀