透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.246.203
  • 期刊

《詩傳大全》與《詩經傳說彙纂》關係探論:簡析明代《詩經》官學的延續與發展

Exploration of the Relationship between Shi Zhuan Da Quan and Qin Ding Shi Jing Chuan Shuo Hui Zuan-The Continuity and Development of Government Education of Shi Zhuan in Ming Dynasty

摘要


此文從明、清二代《詩經》官學延續及發展的角度,分析《詩經傳說彙纂》轉變《詩傳大全》詩經學觀點的實況,以探討這二部代表官方立場的《詩經》詮釋書籍內涵間的異同,及《詩傳大全》影響清代《詩經》官學的實情。經由比較與分析兩書引錄的學者、書籍、引文等的差異,可知《詩傳大全》以朱子《詩集傳》之說爲終極解釋,《詩經傳說彙纂》雖仍推崇《詩集傳》,卻不以其說為唯一標準;而二書內容的差異,亦可見明、清「詩經學」思想轉變的實況。研究所得成果,除有助於釐清並瞭解兩代詩經學官書的演變外,對於這二代詩經學史的相關問題,亦能提供某些較實質的幫助,對整體詩經學史的研究也會有部分的助益。

並列摘要


By analyzing how the perspective transmitted from Qin din Slit jin chuan shuo hui zuan into Shi zhuan da quan, this essay, both in terms of the continuity and development of Government education of Shi jing, probes both the similarities and differences between these two books, which represent authoritative perspectives of Shi jing, and the effect that Shi zhuan da quan had on Shi jing in Government education in Ching Dynasty. Through comparing and examining divergences of scholars, references and quotations, cited both in Qin din Shi jin chuan shun hui zuan and Shi zhuan da quan, we know that Shi zhuan da quan regards Zhu Xi's Shi ji zhuan, as its ultimate interpretations, while Qin din Shi jin chuan shuo hui zuan highly recommends Shi ji zhuan, not taking it as its only standard though. Furthermore, the differences between these two books present the real transition of shi jing xue in Ming and Ching Dynasty. The result of this research not only helps us clarify and understand the transition of official Shi jin between these two dynasties, but also provides more practical assists, which are beneficial to the research of entire Shi jing partially.

參考文獻


陳道潛。淇園編
宋李昉(1960)。太平御覽
清皮錫瑞(1974)。經學歷史
明黃宗羲(1975)。宋儒學案
明顧炎武(1979)。原抄本日知錄

被引用紀錄


黃郁雯(2009)。朱熹《詩經》學在南宋至明初的形成與發展〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02215

延伸閱讀