本研究以210名全省國中及高中體育敎師(男140名,女70名)為研究對象。使用工具包括:中國人A型行為特質量表、體育教師工作壓力來源、認知評估量表、因應策略量表、工作焦慮量表及健康困擾量表六種。研究所使用的統計方法為:獨立性考驗、獨立樣本t考驗、典型相關、及皮爾遜積差相關。蒐集資料經過分析後,主要發現如下: ㈠綜合A型行為特質、工作壓力源、認知評估、因應策略、工作焦慮及健康困擾與背景變項的關係得知:性別與任敎背景(國中、高中)和所選的主要工作壓力源的類別有關。男性體育教師的A型行為特質三項特質皆顯然高於女性教師;而且挑戰評估上男性亦高於女性。把壓力源視為傷害程度上,且認為壓力無法改變的,國中敎師高於高中教師。使用情緒焦點因應策略的頻率上女性體育教師比男性為高;國中體育教師高於高中體育教師。工作焦慮及健康困擾上則以國中體育敎師普遍高於高中體育教師。 ㈡A型行為特質與壓力源的認知評估有典型相關存在;A型行為特質中「攻擊與敵對」特質愈高者,使用傷害評估的頻率愈高;時間緊迫感愈高者使用威脅評估愈多;努力競爭與成就感愈高的使用挑戰評估的頻率愈高。 ㈢A型行為特質與因應策略有典型相關存在。A型行為特質中,時間緊迫感愈高者,使用情緒焦點的因應策略愈多。「努力競爭與成就」傾向愈高者,使用「問題焦點」因應策略頻率愈高。 ㈣認知評估與因應策略之間有典型相關存在。認為壓力源愈能夠加以改變者,使用「問題焦點」因應策略愈多。 ㈤認知評估,因應策略與工作焦慮、健康困擾之間有典型相關存在。使用「挑戰評估」及「問題焦點」因應策略者,其健康困擾程度愈低。認為壓力源愈無法改變者,及使用「情緒焦點」因應策略者,其工作焦慮愈高。 ㈥A型行為特質,認知評估與工作焦慮、健康困擾之間有典型相關存在。A型行為特質中「努力競爭與成就」傾向高,而且使用「挑戰評估」者,其健康困擾程度愈低。
The sample inclueds 210 secondary school physical teachers, randomly draw from all secondary schools in Taiwan Six instruments were utilized, namely: (1) Chinese type A behavior pattern Scale, (2) the list of work-stressors, (3) Cognitive Appraisal Scale; (4)Coping strategies Scale; (5) Work Anxiety Scale; (6) Health Scale. The data were analyzed by test of independence, t-test, canonical correlation analysis, Pearson product-moment correlation. The major findings and conclusions were as follew: (1) partially significant difference were found between the demographic variables such as sex, teaching school; (2) there was a canonical correlation relationship between type A behavior pattern and cognitive appraisal; (3) there was a significant relationship between type A behavior pattern and coping strategies; (4) there was a canonical correlation relationship between cognitive appraisal and coping strategies; (5) there was a canonical correlation relationship among cognitive appraisal, coping strategies and coping results; (6) there was a cononical correlation relationship among type A behavior pattern, cognitive appraisal and coping results.