透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.227.102.59
  • 期刊

抓取動作之手指數與身體尺度比率的年齡差異

Age Differences in Finger Numbers and Body-Scaled Ratios of Prehension

摘要


Purpose: Based on the affordances concepts, grasping ball with various sizes was designed to examine age differences in finger numbers and body-scaled ratios of prehension. Methods: Eighteen participants were in each of child (6-yr-old), adult (30-yr-old), and older adult (70-yr-old) groups (N = 54). All participants were asked to grasp a stationary ball (diameter are 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm.) in separate trial and each size for 3 trials. Two researchers of motor behavior were employed in video systematic observation method for analyzing filmed prehensile trials. The inter-rater reliability was .80 and the intra-rater reliability were .88 and .91, respectively. Results: (1) χ^2 test showed that child group utilized the finger numbers more in relative bigger sizes ball than adult and older adult groups significantly (p < .05); and (2) Mixed-design two-way ANOVA, 3 (age) × 5 (ball sizes) with the ball sizes were repeated measure, and Tukey's HSD Post Hoc test showed significant main effects (p < .05) in age and ball sizes, that revealed the body-scaled conduced ratios of child group were significant (p < .05) different with adult (R(subscript 0) = 1.80) and older adult (R(subscript 0) = 1.69) groups, and the bigger sizes ball had bigger body-scaled conduced ratios (R(subscript 1) = 0.79, R(subscript 2) = 1.35, R(subscript 3) = 1.73, R(subscript 4) = 2.03, R(subscript 5) = 2.32). Conclusions: (1) Children's prehension utilized more fingers for relative bigger ball than adults and older adults did; and (2) Children's body-scaled ratios of prehension smaller then adults and older adults, and there were age differences in body-scaled ratios of prehension.

並列摘要


Purpose: Based on the affordances concepts, grasping ball with various sizes was designed to examine age differences in finger numbers and body-scaled ratios of prehension. Methods: Eighteen participants were in each of child (6-yr-old), adult (30-yr-old), and older adult (70-yr-old) groups (N = 54). All participants were asked to grasp a stationary ball (diameter are 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm.) in separate trial and each size for 3 trials. Two researchers of motor behavior were employed in video systematic observation method for analyzing filmed prehensile trials. The inter-rater reliability was .80 and the intra-rater reliability were .88 and .91, respectively. Results: (1) χ^2 test showed that child group utilized the finger numbers more in relative bigger sizes ball than adult and older adult groups significantly (p < .05); and (2) Mixed-design two-way ANOVA, 3 (age) × 5 (ball sizes) with the ball sizes were repeated measure, and Tukey's HSD Post Hoc test showed significant main effects (p < .05) in age and ball sizes, that revealed the body-scaled conduced ratios of child group were significant (p < .05) different with adult (R(subscript 0) = 1.80) and older adult (R(subscript 0) = 1.69) groups, and the bigger sizes ball had bigger body-scaled conduced ratios (R(subscript 1) = 0.79, R(subscript 2) = 1.35, R(subscript 3) = 1.73, R(subscript 4) = 2.03, R(subscript 5) = 2.32). Conclusions: (1) Children's prehension utilized more fingers for relative bigger ball than adults and older adults did; and (2) Children's body-scaled ratios of prehension smaller then adults and older adults, and there were age differences in body-scaled ratios of prehension.

參考文獻


李村棋(1999)。男童手球投擲動作型式:工作與環境限制效應(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(二)統計原理與分析技術:SPSS中文視窗版操作實務詳析。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
卓俊伶、賴世炯(2000)。失能學生動作表現與技能的過程取向評估。學校體育雙月刊。10(5),5-8。
彭國威(2004)。晚期兒童之環境知覺與踢球動作支撐腳參數:身體比率(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
彭國威、卓俊伶、楊梓楣(2009)。伸手抓取動作之身體尺度比率界限。體育學報。42(3),63-76。

被引用紀錄


彭國威(2011)。單手截取行動時間與空間的適應:直接知覺觀點〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315250877

延伸閱讀