國小性平教育、多元價值觀與生活課程學習成效關係之研究－以台東縣為例

Relationships among Gender Equality Education, Multiple Value Perspectives and Learning Achievement of Life-Curriculum of Elementary School-A Case Study of Taitung County

余舜基(Shun-Chi Yu)

《聯大學報》 18卷2期 (2021/12) Pp. 1-22

摘要

本研究主旨在探討國小性平教育、多元價值觀與生活課程學習成效關係，並以多元價值觀做為中介及調節變數，以性平教育理論、多元價值觀與生活課程學習成效建立結構方程模式。在2018年3～6月份以便利抽樣法在台東縣各國小發放問卷總數為450份其中有效筆數為322筆。研究結果發現，國小學生的性平教育會影響生活課程學習成效，而培養多元價值觀將有助於國小學生性平教育對於生活課程學習的成效；多元價值觀在國小學生性平教育對於生活課程學習的成效之間產生完全中介及部份調節效果。根據以上發現，本研究認為學校為了生活課程學習的成效，應該重視多元價值觀的塑造，同時還要定期考核國小學生的性平教育效果。

關鍵字

性平教育 ； 多元價值觀 ； 生活課程學習成效 ； 國小教育

並列摘要

This study, investigated in 2018, aimed to explore multiple value perspectives as the mediator and moderator between gender equality education and learning achievement of life-curriculum in primary education students. The validated sample included 322 students. A research model of gender equality education, multiple value perspectives and learning achievement of life-curriculum was proposed and tested by using a structural equation modeling approach. Results indicated that multiple value perspectives were a mediator and partial moderator in the relationship between gender equality education and learning achievement of life-curriculum. These findings suggest not only that it is important to consider gender equality education in understanding student learning achievement of life-curriculum but that multiple value perspectives play an important role in consolidating this relationship as well. Based on research results, the author puts forward a number of relevant suggestions and implications of findings for school authorities. Finally, the author provides some suggestions for future research.

並列關鍵字

gender equality education ； multiple value perspectives ； learning achievement of life-curriculum ； primary education

參考文獻

Bartholomee, L. (2017). Beyond the Classroom: Discover the Transformational Power of Living Curriculum. Art Education, 70(6), 49–53. doi ：10.1080/00043125.2017.1361775

Begley, P., & Wong, K. C. (2001). Multiple perspectives on values and ethical leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4), 293–296. doi：10.1080/13603120110078025

Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1032–1055. doi: 10.1002/tea.10051

Gaede, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (2019). The value of multiple perspectives: Problem-solving and critique in the evaluation of social acceptance research—A response to M. Wolsink. Energy Research & Social Science. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.007

Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts：The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 233–240. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012758