郭象《莊子注》方法之第二序考察與反思－以「寄言出意」為核心

Re-examinating Guo Xiang's Annotation of Zhuangzi second-orderly: With Emphasis on 'Taking advantage of expresses own thought by the text narrative narration'

王介成(Chieh-Cheng Wang)

《聯大學報》 19卷2期 (2022/12) Pp. 113-127

摘要

本文旨在研究郭象《莊子注》所用之方法。然因本文並非直切原典索尋郭注之方法，而是將重心置於當代學人對郭注方法之討論，故本文採取之研究進路可稱為「第二序研究」。本文首先將從學界已多有討論之「寄言出意」出發，再次鑑別寄言出意是否可作為《莊子注》之方法；依次，本文欲深入學人既有研究成果，以理析出學人對郭注「其他方法」之界定與說明；最後本文將嘗試說明學人的「研究關懷」（或「研究預設」），並指出此與學人在界定與說明郭注方法時有何內在聯繫。本文發現，研究者對《莊子》文本的態度和預設，實則將影響其對郭注方法之界定與說明，推而廣之也將影響他們對郭象哲學的評價。

關鍵字

郭象 ； 《莊子注》 ； 研究方法 ； 寄言出意

並列摘要

This paper aims at studying the methods used in Guo Xiang's Annotation of Zhuangzi. This paper adopted a research way called 'second-order research', which means the paper would not directly discuss Guo Xiang's explanatory methods in his text but varied contemporary research on how Guo Xiang annotated Zhuangzi. First, the paper's examination would start from the most discussed Guo Xiang method in academia, 'taking advantage of expresses own thought by the text narrative narration'. Then, the paper would examine that whether it could be a valid method in annotating Zhuangzi. Next, the paper would look into the given contemporary research in order to analyze how each scholar defined 'different ways' in Annotation of Zhuangzi and how they explained them. In the end, the essay would try to explain the 'research concern'( or 'research assumption') of each scholar, indicating the inherent relation of their assumption and their definition and explanation. This paper found that the researchers' attitudes and assumptions toward Zhuangzi have in fact affected how they defined and explained the method used in Annotation of Zhuangzi and further have had the impact on how they evaluated Guo Xiang's philosophy.

並列關鍵字

Guo Xiang ； Annotation of Zhuangzi ； Research method ； Taking advantage of expresses own thought by the text narrative narration

參考文獻

【清】郭慶藩，《莊子集釋》。臺北市：萬卷樓，2007。

牟宗三（1993），《才性與玄理》（第八版）。臺北市：臺灣學生書局。

李賢中（2008.01），〈中國哲學研究方法探析〉，《文史哲》第 1 期，頁 38-44。

李賢中（2016），〈論合理性標準在詮釋過程中的作用與限制〉，《中國詮釋學第13 輯》。濟南：山東人民出版社，頁 1-17。

李賢中（2017），〈以名家為參照的《莊子》解釋─論參照系的運用〉，《中國詮釋學第 14 輯》。濟南：山東人民出版社，頁 71-88。