本研究主要以「課程本位測量」(Curriculum-Based Measurement,簡稱CBM)理論為基礎,嘗試研究中文課程本位測量方法在閱讀領域的信度與效度,以作為評量學生閱讀能力的依據。先用「國語文成就測驗」從台北市兩所國小二年級全體學生中,選取低、中、高閱讀能力組各36人,進行研究者自編之「課程本位閱讀測量」,包含「口語朗讀流暢度(Oral Reading Fluency,簡稱ORF)」與「選字測驗(maze task,簡稱Maze)」各八篇。研究顯示:l.整體學生在口語朗讀流暢度、選字測驗上的表現與效標國語文成就測驗間有顯著的相關;2.口語朗讀流暢度與選字測驗能有效區辨不同閱讀能力水準(高、中、低)兒童,且學生在相同版本,四篇不同文本,不論在口語朗讀流暢度、選字測驗之表現,均達到內部一致性顯著相關;3.學生在康軒版與翰林版之口語朗讀流暢度與選字測驗之表現上一致性很高;4.學生經由四週後之重測時,在口語朗讀流暢度與選字測驗整體之表現上均呈現進步情形,並達到顯著相關;5不同計分者使用指導手冊計分結果,口語朗讀流暢度與選字測驗均呈現計分者間一致性顯著相關。 本研究的研究結果顯示口語朗讀流暢度與選字測驗可以有效評量國小二年級學生之閱讀能力,這種省時、容易施測的課程本位評量具有良好的信度與效度。
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of curriculum-based reading measurement. We used Chinese Academic Achievement Test to sample 108 students from 420 second-grade elementary students, whose reading abilities are high, medium, and low. Then apply curriculum-based reading measurement which include Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) and Maze Task (Maze) to those 108 sampling students. The main findings of this research were stated as follows: 1.There are significant correlation among ORF, Maze and the Chinese Academic Achievement Test. 2.ORF and Maze can effectively distinguish three levels of reading capability. Therefore, this supports that ORF and Maze present good construct validity. 3. The results of ORF and Maze from different versions of textbooks are highly consistent. 4. After test-retest reliability, alternate-forms reliability, and scorer reliability, the result reveals that ORF and Maze are reliable measurements. 5. The results of ORF and Maze from different raters are highly consistent. The goal of the study is to provide teachers with a simple, efficient, easy-to-adopt and credible measurement. The result indicates that elementary school teachers can utilize ORF and Maze to evaluate students' reading ability.