透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.231.155
  • 期刊

美國佛蒙特州同性伴侶法制之發展:以2000年「公民結合法」及2009年「婚姻平等法」為論述重心

Developments on Statutory Protections for Same-Sex Couples in Vermont: Focus Attention on the Civil Union Act of 2000 and Marriage Equality Act of 2009

摘要


觀乎美國佛蒙特州同性伴侶法制之發展,其於2000年即開始施行全美第一部,以同性伴侶共同生活關係為唯一規範對象的州層級同性伴侶保護法-「公民結合法」(Civil Union Law)。該法在不修正傳統一男一女婚姻定義的前提下,將州婚姻法下原僅異性伴侶始得享有之所有權益,授與同性伴侶。此一規範同性伴侶共同生活關係之法制模式,亦為日後美國其他州,如:康乃狄克、紐澤西、新罕布夏、羅德島、伊利諾、德拉瓦與夏威夷等州,所仿效。近年來,受國內、外陸續合法化同性婚姻風潮之鼓舞,佛蒙特州立法機關,於2009年4月,更主動制頒承認同性婚姻之「保障宗教自由與承認公民婚姻平等法」(以下簡稱:婚姻平等法)(An Act to Protect Religious Freedom and Recognize Equality in Civil Marriage; Marriage Equality Act),實現同志平權運動長期以來追求同性伴侶亦應享平等婚姻權之目標。如是豐富且多元的佛蒙特州同性伴侶法制發展經驗,對於同性伴侶法制建設尚處一片空白之我國,實具參考價值。因此,本文希冀藉由整理暨分析佛蒙特州2000年公民結合法與2009年婚姻平等法之立法沿革、具體規範內涵及其與聯邦婚姻防衛法的互動關係,期以供我國將來針對此等議題,進行相關法制建構時之參考。

並列摘要


From the perspective of legal developments related to fundamental rights of same-sex couples in United States, Vermont is the first and leading state to create a separate, marriage-like statutory protection entitled ”Vermont Civil Union law” for same-sex couples without provoking greater political backlash. The law not only creates a legal status equal to that of married spouses, but also designs to serve as a substitute for same-sex couples excluded from the definition of traditional marriage. Although the Vermont civil union statute has not fulfilled complete equality for same-sex couples, it reflects the social reality and represents a significant civil rights progress for same-sex couples. More recently, in September, 2009, a new legislature, An Act to Protect Religious Freedom and Recognize Equality in Civil Marriage, took effect in Vermont. Under the Act, same-sex couples are allowed to enter into marriage as their heterosexual counterparts.Unlike Vermont, where state laws have been very progressive in extending state-level spousal rights to same sex couples, either by providing same sex couples a marriage-equivalent regime-civil union or recognizing same-sex marriage, Taiwan's legal regime for regulating same sex relationship is so underdeveloped. Therefore, with the legal needs of same-sex couples in mind, this research, through the introduce, discussion, and analysis of the legal developments with respect to same-sex couples in Vermont, hopes to provide a useful direction for Taiwan Legislature to establish a more reasonable and well-tailored legal regime to cope with the relationship of same-sex couples in the near future.

參考文獻


王海南(2003)。論一夫一妻婚姻制度與重婚信賴保障─評司法院大法官釋字第五五二號解釋。月旦法學雜誌。96,284-297。
司法行政部民法研究修正委員會(1976)。中華民國民法制定史料彙編。司法行政部=Ministry of Justice。
吳信華(2011)。憲法釋論。三民=San-Min。
吳煜宗(2003)。同性戀者的結婚自由。月旦法學教室。14,10-11。
李立如(2007)。婚姻家庭與性別平等─親屬法變遷的觀察與反思。政大法學評論。95,175-227。

被引用紀錄


鍾逸帆(2015)。邁向同性婚姻平權社會:立法模式與司法判決模式之比較分析〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00132
任杰(2016)。同性婚姻合法化歷程:美國經驗,臺灣借鑒〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603615
張琍威(2015)。同性家庭子女收養之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615090684
陳奕昕(2016)。同性家庭人工生殖子女親子關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1005201615102511

延伸閱讀