Today is heritage preservation an important issue. But at the same time, there are also more and more conflicts about heritage preservation. When reviewing written judgments, we can find the preference the jurisdictions have had for experts and the committee system. It has become doubtable whether it is the best procedure model for cultural heritage based on experts' and committees' perspectives, resulting in potential controversies over cultural heritage between experts and general public. We will try to analyze those problems by jurisprudence method in this essay. To analyze those debates in legal study, beyond the legal review of administrative system level, we will have reviews and proposals to reform trial about heritage preservation in administrative courts.