透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.67.26
  • 期刊

從跨國比較之觀點反思台灣護理教育

Reflection on Taiwan Nursing Education from the Perspective of Cross-national Comparison

摘要


台灣護理界致力於提升教學品質,降低學用之落差。本文藉由比較中英兩國護理教育模式、課程設計及教學特色面向之差異,以接軌國際之觀點反思台灣護理教育現況,提出建言,期能培育更多優秀且實用之護理專業人才。於教育模式面,台灣護理系為通才式教育,而英國為專科分流式教育;於課程設計面,英國規範之護理實習實作時數約高出台灣一倍,再者,英國護理系科目能直接對應培育之核心能力;於教學特色面,英國之教學強化學生之自學能力及參與度。綜觀台灣護理教育之優勢為全人概念之模式,學生具備全年齡層及全科性之照護知能,畢業後就業機會寬廣。而台灣護理教育可再著重之處,包含實作能力之養成、課程架構與核心能力之連結性、多元教學策略與評量、強化學生的學習動機及自我學習的責任感。

並列摘要


Nursing professionals are committed to improving teaching quality to reduce the gap between knowledge and practice. This article compares the differences in nursing education models, curriculum design, and teaching strategies between Taiwan and the United Kingdom. To keep up with the best practices of nursing education, it is pertinent to look at domestic and international practices, reflect, and put forward suggestions to cultivate more excellent and practical nursing professionals. In the nursing education model, Taiwan provides a general nursing courses, while the United Kingdom is a four-branches nursing programs. In terms of curriculum design, the hours of practice in the field in the UK is approximately twice as many as those in Taiwan. Furthermore, British nursing subjects directly correspond to the students' core competence. As for teaching strategies, classes in the UK strengthen students' self-learning abilities and increase participation. The advantage of nursing education in Taiwan is its holistic nursing concept. Nursing students are equipped with general knowledge of nursing care, providing them with a wide range of employment opportunities after graduation. This paper concludes by identifying areas in Taiwan's nursing education that can be improved upon, including the development of practical skills, the strengthening of the link between curriculum structure and students' core competence, the integration of multiple teaching strategies and assessments, and the enhancement of students' motivation for learning and self-learning.

參考文獻


台灣護理教育評鑑委員會(2009)。評鑑手冊(大學部)。臺北巿=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:高等教育評鑑中心基金會=Higher Education Evaluation &Accreditation Council of Taiwan。
江青桂、林英姬、江宜娜(2013)。優良護理實習指導教師的教學實踐。教師專業研究期刊。5,85-105。
考選部(2017).106 年第二次專技人員高等考試.取自http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamReport/wFrmExamStatistics.aspx?menu_id=158 [Ministry of Examination R.O.C. (2017) Number of examination qualifiers in senior professional & technical examination 2016. Retrieved from http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamReport/wFrmExamStatistics.aspx?menu_id=158]
考選部(2012).專門職業及技術人員高等考試護理師考試、普通考試護士考試實習認定基準.取自http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamLaws/wfrmExamLaws.aspx?kind=3&menu_id=320&laws_id=110.[Ministry of Examination R.O.C. (2012,). Professionals and technologists examinations act enforcement rules. Retrieved from http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamLaws/wfrmExamLaws.aspx?kind=3&menu_id=320&laws_id=110.]
行政院衛生署編(2008)。護理,台灣。台北市=Taipei City:行政院衛生署=Department of health, executive yuan, Taiwan, ROC.。

被引用紀錄


黃湘萍、趙莉芬、范君瑜、樓迎統、簡淑慧(2020)。從實證觀點談OSCE於護理教育之應用長庚護理31(4),476-487。https://doi.org/10.6386/CGN.202012_31(4).0003
陳盈臻、張曉雲、陳靜修、盧康、劉芊葳(2021)。護理人員臨床照護知能與工作滿意度及留任意願之相關性探討領導護理22(3),24-39。https://doi.org/10.29494/LN.202109_22(3).0003

延伸閱讀