並列摘要
In the history, there were many people advanced the theory of ＂alternative religion＂, which means use the other being to replace the religions. However, as the time past, we found that none of these theories come into reality. The failure of ＂alternative religion＂ has fully demonstrated its utopian, as well as religions' constancy. However, in the process of social development, religions itself always has certain limitations, for it has not become a panacea to solve all the social problems. However, just this limitation provides an opportunity for another being's appearance, which is ＂quasi-religion.＂ If the ＂alternative religion＂ is just empty talk, then the ＂quasi-religion＂ is partially achieved the ideal of ＂alternative religion＂-- to supply a gap of the religion’s deficiencies to some extent.
延伸閱讀
- 陳胤安（2012）。類型學作為神學研究的方法：評《現代教會論類型學：自由、認信與顛覆》。道風：基督教文化評論，(37)，361-369。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-201207-201705040027-201705040027-361-369
- 劉長江（1998）。宗教在現代與後現代中的作用。宗教哲學，(16)，97-108。https://doi.org/10.6309/JORP.199810_(16).0008
- 吳寧遠（1998）。後現代社會中的後現代宗教。宗教哲學，(15)，9-24。https://doi.org/10.6309/JORP.199807_(15).0002
- 歐陽教（1992）。Religion and Its Implications for Education。教育研究集刊，(34)，33-42。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.199206_(34).0002
- 石朝穎（2012）。Investigation to Pluralism of Religion。宗教哲學，(60)，43-52。https://doi.org/10.6309/JORP.201206_(60).0005