透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.222.12
  • 期刊

三款不同避震結構羽球鞋的材料避震測試

The Distinction of Shock Absorbing Ability in Material Test for Three Different Structure Badminton Shoes

摘要


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cushioning properties of different structure badminton shoes in different impact energies. In this study, three different structure badminton shoes were used to compare their shock adsorbing ability (SAA) and offer references for purchasers. All shoes were place on the shock absorbing ability test instrument (SAATI) to survey. According the procedure, SAATI was adjusted at 5 impact heights with a 5±0.1kg striker to impact the shoes. The 5 impact energies were 1.47J、1.96J、2.45J、2.94J and 3.43J. At each condition, the impact was done 12 times repeatedly. Peak deceleration of the striker was measured with an accelerometer attached to the striker during the impact. Independent Two-way ANOVA was used to compare peak deceleration of those shoes. Results were as follow: 1、The peak deceleration of different structure badminton shoes were different significantly (p<.05). 2、The badminton shoe with air cushion has the lowest peak deceleration. 3、The badminton shoe with better cushioning properties has the less peak deceleration increasing rate.

關鍵字

羽球鞋 避震

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cushioning properties of different structure badminton shoes in different impact energies. In this study, three different structure badminton shoes were used to compare their shock adsorbing ability (SAA) and offer references for purchasers. All shoes were place on the shock absorbing ability test instrument (SAATI) to survey. According the procedure, SAATI was adjusted at 5 impact heights with a 5±0.1kg striker to impact the shoes. The 5 impact energies were 1.47J、1.96J、2.45J、2.94J and 3.43J. At each condition, the impact was done 12 times repeatedly. Peak deceleration of the striker was measured with an accelerometer attached to the striker during the impact. Independent Two-way ANOVA was used to compare peak deceleration of those shoes. Results were as follow: 1、The peak deceleration of different structure badminton shoes were different significantly (p<.05). 2、The badminton shoe with air cushion has the lowest peak deceleration. 3、The badminton shoe with better cushioning properties has the less peak deceleration increasing rate.

並列關鍵字

Cushioning Badminton Shoe

參考文獻


邱宏達、相子元、楊文賓(1998)。運動鞋彈性及避震能力之探討。國立體育學院論叢。8(2),271-281。
邱宏達(2004)。不同慢跑鞋與運動表面組合之避震特性。成大體育。
邱宏達、相子元、林德嘉(2002)。由地面反作用力評估鞋低避震能力-材料與人體測試之比較。體育學報。32,69-78。
邱宏達、相子元(1997)。運動方式與鞋墊厚度對避震效果之影響。體育學報。21,207-217。
尹登月(1999)。物性測試方法SATRA PM142-落重吸震測試。鞋技通訊。108,92-94。

被引用紀錄


張盈琪(2013)。不同拖鞋對人體步態著地期生物力學參數之影響〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00169

延伸閱讀