透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.89.85
  • 期刊

親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究:以禁制、遷出及遠離令爲例

Study on the Effectiveness of Protection Orders of Intimate Partner Violence Incidents

摘要


民事保護令是我國家庭暴力防治法中最重要的保護措施之一,本研究旨在探討親密伴侶暴力案件禁制令、遷出令及遠離令等保護令之成效,以女性被害人、男性施暴者案件爲研究對象,透過對擁有保護令之婦女(n=203),進行二次的追蹤調查,探討擁有保護令婦女的受暴狀況、民事保護令核發後施暴者再施暴與違反保護令之情形、以及影響保護令成效之相關因素。研究發現,擁有保護令的婦女普遍遭受到施暴者嚴重的暴力對待,暴力型態包括肢體暴力、性暴力、脅迫控制、性暴力、跟蹤及精神傷害等,受暴時間平均超過六年。對於禁制令、遷出令及遠離令之效果,於核發保護令第三、九個月後之二次對被害人的追蹤調查後顯示,施暴者整體違反保護令之比率約四成,而再發生肢體暴力之比率則約19%。有關違反保護令之相關因素,發現施暴者具有犯罪前科、有精神疾病,施暴者對被害人有脅迫控制及跟蹤等行爲時,施暴者違反保護令及再度發生肢體暴力之可能性均顯著較高;另保護令核發之內容是否符合被害人之需求及警察是否落實執行,與施暴者是否遵守保護令亦有顯著相關。最後本文亦針對研究結果加以討論,並對實務工作之意涵提出建議。

並列摘要


Protection order is one of the most important safety strategies on the Domestic Violence Prevention Act in Taiwan. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of protection orders which related to safety directly, including forbidden to engage in family violence, to threat victim, and to engage in harassment, or other unnecessary acts of contact with the victim, order to leave the residence of the victim, and order to stay away from the victim's location . By interviewing female victims of intimate partner violence after receiving protection orders 3 and 9 months, this study wanted to understand battered women's victimization experience, the violation situation of offenders, and factors related to the effectiveness of protection orders. The findings indicated that the battered women with protection orders experiencing severe physical violence, sexual violence, coercive control and stalking from their intimate partners. The average victimization of battered women with protection order lasted over six years. The protection orders are violated of 40%, and the women re-abused are about 19%. The offenders who have a history of violent crime, mental disorders, coercive controlling and stalking behaviors are more often than others to violate protection orders. In addition, when the contents of protection orders are more conforming to victims' needs, and police cnforcing orders fully, the offenders are less likely to violate protection orders. Finally, policy implications and suggestions have been discussed.

參考文獻


內政部( 2010)《家庭暴力案件統計》。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會網頁(http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/public/Attachment/01261711871.xls) AttachmentlO 1261711871.xlS )
司法院(2010 ) 《司法統計》。司法院網頁(http://www.judicial.gov.tw/iuds/index l.htm)
柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力:理論政策與實務。台北:巨流。
王珮玲、沈慶鴻()。,未出版。
王樂民、鄭瑞隆(2008)。警察機關執行保護令對遭受婚姻暴力婦女脫離受暴關係成效之研究。亞洲|家庭暴力與性侵害期刊。4(2),1-30。

被引用紀錄


陳虹燁(2013)。防制纏擾行為之立法建議─以校園內不當追求行為為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201300550
傅莉蓁(2015)。家庭暴力防治社工對危險評估之知能探討-以高雄市親密關係高危機案件為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00294
宋名萍(2016)。活在無形牢籠裡:探討親密伴侶暴力中的高壓控管〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602071
耿瑞琦(2011)。家庭親職功能與同儕影響力對大學生約會暴力自我覺察之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02271
潘雅惠(2012)。法官繼續專業教育需求與內涵之研究:以辦理民事保護令事件法官為例〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613531904

延伸閱讀