技術取得模式與經營績效之實證研究：考慮廠商的決策影響

本文主要以台灣IC設計與製造業為研究樣本，探討廠商委外或內部化生產製程的決策對其經營績效的影響。由於廠商在策略選擇時係奠基於廠商特質與產業環境，所以決策的選擇是內生的且具自我選擇特性，若實證模型忽視廠商自我選擇的影響，則在不同策略選擇下的經營績效評估模型將產生偏差，進而得到不正確的實證結果。因此本文旨在應用Heckman的二階段最小平方法，將樣本自我選擇因素納入模型中以修正所產生的偏誤。實證結果發現，廠商之生產技術取得模式受交易特性與廠商特性的影響。再者，研發能力、技術取得經驗、決策錯誤機率與廠商自我選擇修正因子是影響成本效率的重要因素。最後，本文發現委外廠商之成本效率優於內部化廠商。

關鍵字

技術取得模式；樣本自我選擇偏誤；經營績效

並列摘要

This paper investigates how Taiwanese IC design firms and IC manufacture firms' decisions to outsource or internalize production after their performance. Firms choose strategies based on their attributes and industry; therefore, strategy choice is endogenous and self-selected. Empirical models that do not account for this and regress performance measures on strategy choice variables are potentially misspecified and their conclusions are incorrect. We use Heckman's two-stage technique that has been developed to account for the self-selection's effect on hard-to-measure or unobservable characteristics to correct the bias. The findings reveal first the firm-and transaction-specific features are strong influence of firms' production technology acquisition mode, second, the ability of R&D, the experience of the production technology acquisition, governance misfit and self-selection are influence of cost efficiency, finally We find that the cost efficient of outsourcing is superior to internalization.

並列關鍵字

Technology Acquisition Mode ； Sample Selection Bias Performance

參考文獻

Amburgey, T.L.,Kelly, D.,Barnett, W.P.(1993).Resetting the Clock: the Dynamics of Organization Change and Failure.Administrative Science Quarterly.38,51-73.

Google Scholar

Banker, R.D.,Charnes, A.,Cooper, W.W.(1984).Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.Management Science.30,1078-1092.

Google Scholar

Barney, J.B.(1991).Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management.17(1),99-120.

Google Scholar

Belderbos, R.,Carree, M.B.,Diederen, B.,Lokshin, B.,Veugelers, R.(2004).Heterogeneity in R&D Cooperation Strategies.International Journal of Industrial Organization.22,1289-1263.