The outcome of surgical repair of complete rotator cuff tears varies substantially and one technique has not been uniformly successful. We hypothesize that the integrity of the rotator cuff, including its ability to transmit force, can be restored through either direct or patch repair. However, the stability and kinematics of the glenohumeral joint are different following each type of repair. The goal of this study is to compare the resulting constraint and kinematic changes on the glenohumeral joint following direct and synthetic patch repairs of a torn rotator cuff. Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. Direct repair with sutures passing perpendicular to the muscle line of action, and synthetic patch repair with sutures at the edge of the circular graft were performed for comparison. Stability tests were performed in three clinically relevant positions. In general, the joint laxity, as represented by the displacement ratio, increased significantly in the inferior direction and moderately in the anterior and posterior directions when the defects were created at either the critical area or rotator interval. After either patch repair or direct repair, the joint laxity was reduced but not restored to the level of intact condition. Stability of the glenohumeral joint after repair is another important factor to consider during surgical planning. This study substantiates that the use of synthetic fabrics to bridge rotator cuff defects compared with using direct repair achieves equivalent results in reducing the joint laxity and restoring joint stability.