Objectives. The objective of this study was to compare the concentrations of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) in six electroplating factories in central Taiwan. Methods. The types of electroplating factories included: nickel-Cr (n = 1), mixed (nickel-Cr and hard Cr) Cr (n = 3) and hard Cr (n = 2). In each factory, area samples and personal samples were taken. Cr(VI) was analyzed by visible absorption spectrophotometry (VAS)- graphite furnace and total Cr was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Concentration of Cr(III) was determined by subtracting Cr(VI) from total Cr. Results. The results showed that hard Cr factories had higher concentrations of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) than the other Cr factories. In all factories Cr(VI) concentrations were lower than Cr(III) concentrations. Cr(VI) comprised 5% to 10% of total Cr. For Cr(III), there was a significant positive correlation between area and personal sampling (r = 0.62, p < 0.05), but for Cr(VI) there was no statistical significance. Conclusions. Because Cr(VI) is very unstable during the electroplating process, great care must be taken when conducting air sampling and analysis.
Objectives. The objective of this study was to compare the concentrations of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) in six electroplating factories in central Taiwan. Methods. The types of electroplating factories included: nickel-Cr (n = 1), mixed (nickel-Cr and hard Cr) Cr (n = 3) and hard Cr (n = 2). In each factory, area samples and personal samples were taken. Cr(VI) was analyzed by visible absorption spectrophotometry (VAS)- graphite furnace and total Cr was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Concentration of Cr(III) was determined by subtracting Cr(VI) from total Cr. Results. The results showed that hard Cr factories had higher concentrations of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) than the other Cr factories. In all factories Cr(VI) concentrations were lower than Cr(III) concentrations. Cr(VI) comprised 5% to 10% of total Cr. For Cr(III), there was a significant positive correlation between area and personal sampling (r = 0.62, p < 0.05), but for Cr(VI) there was no statistical significance. Conclusions. Because Cr(VI) is very unstable during the electroplating process, great care must be taken when conducting air sampling and analysis.