目的 本文的研究目的係發展與評值護理人員工作滿意量表與護理人員專業承諾量表的信度與效度。 方怯 研究對象來自二個醫院360位護理人員,研究工具係由研究群參考文獻發展而得。效度方面共執行內容效度、建構效度、鑑別效度及同時效度等。信度方面則使用內在一致性及再測信度期能獲得較好的穩定性。 結果 護理工作滿意度量表工具內在一致性為Cronbach's alpha 0.92,再測信度為0.74。經由建構效度量表呈現四個構面18題,包括人際關係、福利與升遷、工作環境、工作量:每個題目的鑑別效度超過0.9。護理專業承諾量表的內在一致性為Cronbach's alpha 0.91,再測信度為0.91方面,經由建構效度量表呈現三個構面19題:專業認同、專業投入、專業留任:每個題目的鑑別效度超過0.9。 結論 本研究發展的二份量表均有很好的信效度,建議健康照護機構使用量表,可以瞭解護理人員的工作滿意度及專業承諾。
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of two instruments designed to measure job satisfaction among nurses. Methods. The participants comprised 360 nurses from two hospitals. The two instruments, the Nurses' Job Satisfaction Scale (NJSS) and the Nurses' Professional Commitment Scale (NPCS), were developed based on literature review and clinical experience to assess job satisfaction and professional commitment among nurses. The validity of each instrument was determined by measuring the content validity, construct validity, criterion validity and concurrent validity. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were also examined to estimate the stability of the scales. Results. The final version of the NJSS showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.92) and test-retest reliability (Pearson's correlation=074). The construct validity of the NJSS was evaluated by factor analysis and four factors were revealed: relationship, benefit and promotion, job environment, and workload. Each item's discriminate power was over 0.9. The internal consistency reliability of the NPCS had a Cronbach's coefficient level of 0.91. Correlation of NPCS test-retest reliability was 0.91. The NPCS consists of three factors with 19 items: nursing professional compliance, involvement of nursing professionals and retention of nursing professionals. Each item's discriminate power was over 0.9. Conclusion. The NJSS and NPCS are valid and reliable instruments for evaluating nurses' job satisfaction and professional commitment in Taiwan.