析論台灣課程研究之本土化－以博士論文層級為例

A Perspective on Lndigenization of Curriculum Studies in Taiwan-A Case of Doctoral Dissertations

陳沛嵐(Pei-Lan Chen)

《課程與教學》 8卷1期 (2005/01) Pp. 49-68

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200501.0049

摘要

本文主要探討博士論文層級中台灣課程研究本土化的情形。主要從台灣課程研究本土化的動機、目的和走向分析課程研究本土化的內涵，並從中導引出課程研究本土化的分析架構－研究類型、理論觀點、研究對象、主要參考文獻、研究實徵性、研究工具和研究目的－等面向，依此定錨點以質、量相輔兼顧時間軸的方式分析七十年度到九十年度博士層級的台灣課程研究本土化風貌。結果發現，台灣課程研究的研究類型與研究實徵性以應用研究（63.5%）和實徵性（91.8%）研究為主要內涵，而課程研究的本土化程度高低依序是研究對象（94.1%）、研究目的（77.7%）、研究工具（67.1%）、研究觀點（30.6%）、以及研究文獻（17.6%）。研究者並以塗鴉式的研究工具－原始尚待精煉；馬賽克式的研究觀點－本質是外來的觀點，表象卻打上本土的迷霧；蒙太奇式的研究文獻－外來與本土資料的剪輯與拼湊；本土化外國概念和課程馬太效應來比喻台灣課程研究。最後，研究者則以本土智慧的觀點歸結被消音的台灣課程研究如何在西方的洪流中重新發聲。

關鍵字

台灣 ； 本土化 ； 課程研究

並列摘要

This research mainly explores the indigenization of curriculum studies in Taiwan, especially focusing on doctoral dissertations. First, the author analyzes the motivation, purpose and direction of indigenousness in Taiwan curriculum studies. Through these analysis, the author sets up the main anchors, including research types, research views, research subjects, research literature, empirical data, research methods and research purposes, to evaluate the indigenousness of Taiwan curriculum studies. The results shows applied and empirical studies are characteristics of curriculum studies in Taiwan. Besides, high degree of indigenization in subject dimension, followed by purpose, method, view and literature. Furthermore, the author tries to create several metaphors-graffiti-method, mosaic-view, montage-literature, indigenous foreign concepts, curriculum Matthew effect-to describe Taiwan curriculum studies. Finally, the author urges indigenous wisdom should be emphasized in order to make Taiwan curriculum have its unique voice in the international curriculum field.

並列關鍵字

Curriculum Studies ； Indigenization ； Taiwan

參考文獻

Bernstein, B.(1971).Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the sociology of Education.Collier Macmillan.

Franklin, B. M.(2000).Curriculum & Consequence :Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling.New York:Teachers College Press.

Kincheloe.Voice From The Academy.NY:Falmer.

Ohmae, K.(1990).The Borderless World.New York:Harpercollins Publishing.

Popkewitz, T. S(2000).Educational Knowledge: Changing Relationships between the State, Civil Society, and the Educational Community.NY:State University of New York Press.