專題、問題與探究導向總整課程教學策略對學習成效的影響

The Influence of Teaching Strategies on Learning Effectiveness in the Project-, Problem- and Inquiry-Based Capstone Course

李隆盛(Lung-Sheng Lee) ； 孔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung) ； 陳芊妤(Chian-Yu Chen) ； 林坤誼(Kuen-Yi Lin)

《課程與教學》 22卷3期 (2019/07) Pp. 55-76

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201907_22(3).0003

摘要

兼容專題、問題和探究導向學習的總整課程，幾乎已成為工程（或科技）取向班制的必修畢業課程，且修課學生常分成多個組別、由多位教師帶領，因而引發「不同教師教學策略差異，對學生學習成效有何影響」的問題。為解答此一問題，本研究針對某大學已實施多年總整課程的科技系，透過教師深度訪談問卷、學生自評核心能力表現問卷及學生訪談問卷進行資料蒐集與分析。結果發現：一、教師的教學策略類型可分為著重學生經驗擴展、設計思考和同儕協作；二、第一類型（經驗擴展型）教學策略就學習動機、上課時間及學習成效三方面，在學生知覺與教師期望兩方面有明顯落差，其他兩類型策略在各方面則無教與學上的落差；三、不同類型教學策略的學生學習成效，由高而低序大致為第三、第二和第一類型，但採第一、三類型策略教師都強調學生主動學習態度高度影響學習成效。

關鍵字

總整課程 ； 專題導向學習 ； 問題導向學習 ； 探究導向學習 ； 教學策略 ； 學習成效

並列摘要

The capstone course including project-, problem- and inquiry-based learning has become a required graduation course for engineering- or technology-rich programs. The students in this course are often divided into groups and supervised by multiple teachers. What are the influence of teaching strategies on learning effectiveness? In order to answer this question, this study interviewed the teacher and the students, and surveyed the students' self-assessed core competence. The results showed that: (1) The teaching strategies of the group supervisors can be divided into three types: Type I--student experience expansion, Type II--student design thinking and Type III-- student peer collaboration; (2) Only Type I strategy showed gap between student's perception and teacher expectation in terms of learning motivation, class time and learning effectiveness; and (3) The learning effectiveness of students with different types of teaching strategies can be roughly ranked, in descending order, as: Type III, II and I. However, the teachers adopting Types I or II strategy claimed that students' active learning attitudes had high impact on learning effectiveness.

並列關鍵字

capstone course ； project-based learning ； problem-based learning ； inquiry-based learning ； teaching strategy ； learning effectiveness

參考文獻

Leu, L. J., & Liu, M. (2015). Summary of developments in the civil engineering capstone course in Taiwan. 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). doi:10.1109/ICL.2015.7318181

呂良正（2016）。透過 Capstone 課程評量「應屆畢業生核心能力」。取自https://www.ieet.org.tw/text/Capstone/20160617_1/20160617_IEET 成果導向教學與評量策略研討會(I)_Capstone 檢視核心能力.pdf

李隆盛（1996）。工藝科教材教法新趨勢：模組化的課程設計與解決問題的教學策略。科技與技職教育的課題。臺北市：師大書苑。

岳修平、鐘婉莉（2005）。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，25，1-23。

邱于真（2014）。教與學的合頂石—總整課程（Capstone Course）。評鑑雙月刊，49。取自http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/05/01/6153.aspx