透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.198.43
  • 期刊

想像的危機:「反恐時代」美國的危機建構與臺灣的戰略選擇

Imagined Crisis: The Crisis Constructed by U.S. and Strategic Options for Taiwan During ‘the Age of Anti - Terrorism'

摘要


911 事件發生後,美國為因應反恐戰爭的需求,快速的建立一個危機戰略架構。本文研究重點即在探討美國如何建立反恐戰爭的危機架構,以因應層出不窮的恐怖危機。相對的,臺灣在「反恐時代」的國際變局之下,將如何建構自己的安全戰略,以及它跟美國的戰略架構有何關連? 作者在文中提出一個「想像的危機」概念,作為分析的前提。任何戰略家要建立戰略架構時,必然都會去假想一種危機的狀態,再配合地緣戰略的思考,進而從真實與想像之間推論出處理危機的行為。因此,危機不僅是一種情境、一種想像,也是戰略建構的基礎。作者藉由這個分析架構,應用來解釋美國在「反恐時代」所建立的危機戰略,以及分析臺灣應做的戰略選擇,期能賦予傳統的危機理論一個新的生命。

並列摘要


After September 11th events, U.S constructed a framework for crisis management rapidly respond to the anti-terrorism warfare. They maintain the original international systems not be disintegrated due to the terrorism events, through redefining the enemy, reconstructing the international system, and changing the past framework of geo-strategic. The main purpose of this article is to evaluate that how U. S. construct a framework for anti-terrorism warfare and how to fight terrorism crisis. In contracts, when Taiwan faces“the age of anti-terrorism”, she should construct her own security strategy. And to deal with the relationship between the security strategy of Taiwan and the framework of U.S is another topic of this article. In this article, the author adduces the concept of“imagined crisis”as the analytic foundation. The term of“imagined crisis” is the premise of strategic theory-construction.Any strategists, when they construct strategic framework, would synthetic crisis atmosphere with geo-strategic thinking and infer all the actions of crisis from reality and imagined.Therefore, the crisis is not only a situation but also an imagination and this is the base to construct strategy. Based on this analysis framework, the author explores the U.S. how to construct crisis strategy during the age of anti-terrorism, and to analogy the framework to Taiwan to construct his own crisis strategy. I hope to endue traditional crisis theory a new life.

參考文獻


Adomeit, H.(1986).Soviet Crisis Prevention and Management - Why and When do the Soviet Leaders Take Risks?.Orbis.Spring
Allison, G. T.(1971).Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
Anderson, B.(1983).Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.London:Verso.
Bake, J.(1991).America in Asia: Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Community.Foreign Affairs.70(5)
Brecher, M.(1978).Studies in Crisis Behavior.NJ:Transaction Books.

被引用紀錄


蔡明樺(2014)。從恐怖主義組織之視角探討「以、巴衝突」之發展〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00188
沈能策(2010)。建構我國國家安全機制之研究-戰略思考觀點分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.01091
朱柔潔(2009)。九一一事件後歐洲聯盟與美國在歐洲地區的反恐合作(2001-2007年)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.00522
劉育成(2008)。冷戰後美國與中國在東南亞的競爭與合作(1991-2007)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00811
黃家文(2007)。美國對中共安全戰略之分析-以小布希時期為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2007.01093

延伸閱讀