透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.58.197.26
  • 期刊

反介入撒手鐧?解析解放軍的飛彈威脅

Assassin's Mace for Anti-access? Exploring the Missile Threats from People's Liberation Army

摘要


解放軍近期的飛彈武力發展,被認為即將使美軍的介入陷於險境,但這卻是過度地誇大。彈道飛彈與巡弋飛彈都是消耗性武器,各有所長也各有不足,目前的技術固然嘗試結合兩者的特性,但仍無法根本改變飛彈先天的局限,延伸射程之餘還要提高精確度,飛彈單位成本將不斷上升,不易累積足夠數量突破美軍已部署的多層次飛彈防禦。因此,美軍介入臺海情勢的能力其實並未動搖,對美國而言,解放軍飛彈威脅的意義是政治性的,考驗著美國保衛臺灣的決心。對此,美國究竟會轉趨退縮還是轉趨堅決?需要吾人持續密切關注。

並列摘要


The recent development of missile forces of People's Liberation Army (PLA) is claimed to gradually keep the U.S. intervention in Cross-Strait conflicts at bay. Nonetheless, this claim is an exaggeration. Ballistic missiles are fast and thus hard to intercept, but are expensive and inaccurate. In contrast, cruise missiles are inexpensive and accurate, but are slow and thus easy to intercept. Both are constrained by their inherent character as an expendable weapon. The longer the range, the higher the price; thus, the fewer the number, the less likely it is that the missiles can project destructive power towards targets, unless they are nuclear-armed. Furthermore, given that the cost increases with range, medium or intermediate range missiles are bound to be excessively expensive, and they are unlikely to neutralize the U.S. missile defense system. As a result, except China's immediate regions (such as Taiwan or U.S. forward deployments in East Asia), the PLA missile forces alone cannot pose a threat to the U.S. aircraft carriers or military bases in Guam. The implications of missile threats are rather political: to test the U.S. resolution to defend Taiwan.

參考文獻


Cordesman, Anthony H.,Wagner, Abraham R.(1990).The Lessons of Modern War, Volume I: The Arab-Israeli Conflicts, 1973-1989.Boulder:Westview Press.
Karp, Aaron(1996).Ballistic Missile Proliferation: The Politics and Technics.New York:Oxford University Press.
Shlapak, David A.,Orletsky, David T.,Reid, Toy I.,Tanner, Murray Scot,Wilson, Barry(2009).A Question of Balance: Political Context and Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Dispute.Santa Monica:RAND.
Sokol, Anthony Eugene(1961).Seapower in the Nuclear Age.Washington, DC:Public Affairs Press.
Stillion, John,Orletsky, David(1999).Airbase Vulnerability to Conventional Cruise Missile and Ballistic Missile Attacks: Technology, Scenarios, and U.S. Air Force Responses.Santa Monica:RAND.

被引用紀錄


王慧民(2012)。美國東亞戰略轉型之研究:兼論美國對台軍售的演變與發展〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613504815

延伸閱讀