由世界運動禁藥管制規範分析個人資料跨境傳輸與委託行使公權力之法律議題

Analysis of the Legal Issues of Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data and Delegation of Power of the Public Authority From the World Anti-Doping Code

陳宏志(Hung-Chih Chen)

《大專體育》 159期 (2021/12) Pp. 44-54

https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.202112_(159).0003

摘要

在國內外運動賽事，運動禁藥管制對於主管機關、運動相關協會、教練或運動員來說，都十分重要。然而，運動禁藥管制措施和個人資料（簡稱個資）的蒐集、處理、利用息息相關，包括運動員行蹤報告制度、藥檢時需提取運動員的血液及尿液樣本，以及分析並利用樣本中的數據資料，涉及運動員之基本權的保護。且世界運動禁藥管制機構、中華奧林匹克委員會及中華運動禁藥防制基金會，三者之關係與運作，攸關臺灣執行運動禁藥管制規範之實踐。綜此，本文目的將以運動員行蹤資料、藥檢報告及結果公告三項規範出發，透過監察院2019年之實際案例，及審酌國內外主管機關資料，以瞭解臺灣法律之適用；並對個資跨境傳輸、委託行使公權力二大關鍵之法律議題進行分析。最後，本文建議提升法律位階，以保障運動員權利及符合法律保留原則。

關鍵字

世界運動禁藥管制機構 ； 中華運動禁藥防制基金會 ； 行蹤資料 ； 藥檢報告 ； 結果公告

並列摘要

The anti-doping control plays a critical rule for athletes, coaches, government and organization within internal/oversea sports events. Moreover, anti-doping control regulation is involved basic protection of athletes and also relevant to personal data collection, analysis including athlete's whereabouts reporting system and sample of athletes' blood or urinalysis. It's worthy to discuss three roles involving World Anti-Doping Agency, Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency, three of them impacts a lot for implementation of anti-doping code and practices and need further discussion. The purpose of this article is to take perspectives from athletes' whereabouts data, reports of drug test and result announcement based on Control Yuan's report of 2019 in Taiwan. Throughout real case studies and relevant reliable information from governments, aligns with Taiwan laws; and cross-border transfer of personal data and delegation of power of the public authority to analyze the two key legal issues. Finally, this article suggests to elevate the legal rank to protect the rights of athletes and comply with the principle of legal reservations.

並列關鍵字

World Anti-Doping Agency ； Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency ； whereabouts data ； reports of drug test ； result announcement

參考文獻

陳慶鴻（2015）。運動領域的法律與道德問題─以運動槍手為例。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，4卷 2 期，1-15 頁。doi:10.3966/2226535X2015060 402001[Chen, C.-H. (2015). The law and ethics issues of sport ─ By the sports cheaters. Journal of National Taiwan University of Sport, 4(2), 1-15. doi:10.3966/2226535X2015060402001]

黃郁婷、湯添進（2015）。世界運動禁藥管制機構(WADA) 之權力探源。中華體育季刊，29 卷 2期，161-170 頁。doi:10.3966/102473002015092902010[Huang, Y.-T., & Tan, T.-C. (2015). In retrospect of the establishment of WADA: Whence, how and whither? Quarterly of Chinese Physical Education, 29(2), 161-170. doi:10.3966/102473002015092902010]

Phillips, M. (2018). International data-sharing norms: From the OECD to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Human Genetics, 137(8), 575-582. doi:10.1007/s00439-018-1919-7

van der Sloot, B., Paun, M., & Leenes, R. (2020). Looking at the anti-doping regime through the EU Data Protection Lens. In B. van der Sloot, M. Paun, & R. Leenes (Eds.), Athletes’human rights and the fight against doping: A study of the European legal framework (pp. 131-187). Berlin, Germany: TMC Asser Press. doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-351-1_3

中華運動禁藥防制基金會（無日期）。關於我們。資料引自 https://www.antidoping.org.tw/organization/[Chinese Taipei Anti-Doping Agency. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved from https://www.antidoping.org.tw/en/organization/]