透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.227.228.95
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

《說文解字篆韻譜》與大徐本《說文解字》反切之比較研究

The Comparative Study About Fanqie of "Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Juan Yun Pu" and Da Xu Version of "Shuo Wen Jie Tzi"

摘要


南唐至北宋時期,徐鉉(916-991)、徐鍇(920-974)兄弟均曾對《說文解字》加以編輯,徐鉉奉命校訂《說文解字》,徐鍇作《說文解字繫傳》與《說文解字篆韻譜》。此後,徐鉉也曾對《說文解字篆韻譜》進行修訂,但今傳大徐本《說文解字》與《說文解字篆韻譜》呈現的反切卻不相同,前人將此差異視為中古實際語音演變的反映。宋代丁度(990-1053)等人奉敕撰修的《集韻》具有廣泛收音的特色,本文以《集韻》重新檢視《說文解字篆韻譜》與大徐本《說文解字》反切,發現相異反切實際上均為多音字,前人所言之音變情況並不存在,二書的相異切語應與反切取音密切相關。

並列摘要


During the period from the Southern Tang Dynasty to the Northern Song Dynasty, Xu Xuan (916-991) and Xu Kai (920-974) (Xu Xuan's brother) all edited 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi》. Xu Xuan was ordered to revise《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi》, Xu Kai wrote 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Ji Chuan》 and 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Juan Yun Pu》. Since then, Xu Xuan has also revised the 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Juan Yun Pu》, but Fan Chie of 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi》 is not the same as that in 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Juan Yun Pu》.The ancients regarded the difference as response to the changing of actual speech in the Middle Ages. In the Song Dynasty, Ding Du (990-1053) and others wrote《Ji Yun》 which has a wide range of voices.This article re-examines Fanqie in 《Ji Yun》 with 《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi Juan Yun Pu》 and Da Xu version of《Shuo Wen Jie Tzi》, it is found that the different Fanqie is actually a multi-sound word. The view of changing of actual speech in the Middle Ages is not established. The different Fanqie in two books should be closely related to the sound of Fanqie.

延伸閱讀