康德的公共性與超越共同體：都市計劃民衆參與之理論重構

Kantian Publicness and Transcending Commonwealth: Reconstruction of Public Participation Theory in Urban Planning

謝旭昇(Hsu-Sheng Hsieh)

《公共行政學報》 61期 (2021/09) Pp. 1-40

https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202109_(61).0001

摘要

在都市計畫制定過程中，利益的不確定性和衝突時常阻礙了民眾參與的實踐，但即使克服該些阻礙，現行的民眾參與制度仍導向共同體成員（政府、實施者、所有權人）在追求自身最大利益下互相制衡之結果。然而，在考量都市計劃對外部環境和世代環境具備重大影響性下，實難論定該種結果能符合「公共利益」，此一議題突顯了在都市計劃中對於何謂「公共性」仍需再加探索。鑒此，本文重新檢視台灣都市計劃民眾參與之既有制度與文獻，歸納現行參與模式與理念，並識別具備公共性的民眾參與之實踐與理論的缺口；在此基礎上，本文引入康德對於「公共性」的轉向，即理性之公開運用，此有賴於公民的主動身分，在其利益和共同體利益無直接關係下，方能以普遍性法則作為行為決策所依據之法則，使其行為決策能如同「他者」作成之行為決策而具備普遍的公共性。因此，本文指出，民眾參與應納入無關共同體利益之空間和時間向度的他者之意見，此可透過隨機選擇引入參與者，並創造其需面對社會公眾之條件，以使其能夠代理他者之意見。最後，基於理論的反思和重建，為修復都市計劃的公共性及公共利益，本文對當前民眾參與制度之修正與未來公共參與模式之擘劃提供建議。

關鍵字

都市計劃 ； 民眾參與 ； 康德 ； 公共性 ； 世界公民

並列摘要

Uncertainty and conflict of interests often impede the practice of public participation in urban planning; nevertheless, even if overcoming the impediments, the current public participation institution still tends to bring about the outcome that members within the commonwealth (the government, the executor, and property owners) pursue their maximum interests with mutual restrictions. However, given the enormous impact of urban planning on the external and generational environment, the outcome should not be judged as agreeing with the ＂public interest.＂ This issue highlights that the content of ＂publicness＂ in urban planning needs further exploration. Therefore, this study reviews the existing institutions and literature of public participation in urban planning in Taiwan to deduce the current participation patterns and ideas and identifies the gap in the practice and theory of public participation with publicness. On the basis, this study introduces the Kantian shift in ＂publicness,＂ namely, the public use of reason, which relies on active citizenship without the direct relationship with commonwealth benefits, enabling decision-making to be based on universality and as others make to reach universal publicness. Thus, this study indicates that public participation should incorporate the opinions of others in spatial and temporal dimensions who are not involved in commonwealth benefits. This incorporation could be achieved by selecting participants randomly and bringing them the condition of facing the public to represent others' opinions. Finally, through theoretical reflection and reconstruction, this study proposes suggestions on modifying the current public participation institution and rearranging the pattern of future public participation to restore publicness and public interest in urban planning.

並列關鍵字

urban planning ； public participation ； Kant ； publicness ； cosmopolitan perspective

參考文獻

何友鋒、劉正智、劉玉屏（2010）。民眾參與都市設計審議之研究。設計學報，15（1），51-70。Ho, Yu-Feng, Liu, Cheng-Chih, & Liu, Yu-Pin (2010). Min zhong can yu dou shi she ji shen yi zhi yan jiu [A possibility study for public participation of urban design review]. Journal of Design, 15(1), 51-70.

杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜（2007）。風險溝通與民主參與：以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技醫療與社會，5，71-110。Tu, Wen-Ling, Shih, Li-Wen, & Huang, Ting-I (2007). Feng xian gou tong yu min zhu can yu: Yi zhu ke yi lan ji di zhi she zhi wei li [Risk communication and public participation: A case study of building Hsin-chu Science-based Industrial Park in I-lan]. Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine, 5, 71-110.

周家瑜（2014）。盧梭、康德與永久和平。人文及社會科學集刊，26（4），621-657。Chou, Chia-Yu (2014). Lu suo, kang de yu yong jiu he ping [Rousseau, Kant and Perpetual Peace]. Journal of social science and philosophy, 26(4), 621-657.

柄谷行人（2011）。倫理 21。林暉鈞（譯），臺北：心靈工坊。譯自：倫理 21。2003。Kojin Karatani (2011). Lun li 21 [Ethics 21]. Lin, Hui-Chun trans. Taiepi: Psygarden. Trasnlated from Ethics 21. 2003.

柄谷行人（2019）。移動的批判：康德與馬克思。林暉鈞（譯），臺北：心靈工坊。譯自：トランスクリティーク─カントとマルクス。2010。Kojin Karatani (2019). Yi dong de pi pan: Kang de yu ma ke si [Transcritique: On Kant and Marx]. Lin, Hui-Chun trans. Taiepi: Psygarden. Trasnlated from Transcritique: On Kant and Marx. 2010.