本研究主要的目的是在瞭解國小學童攻擊行為的社會認知歷程,根據社會認知模式發展適合之衡鑑工具與衡鑑方法。研究者自編包含口語攻擊、肢體攻擊與曖昧攻擊等三種人際衝突問題情境,並發展以臨床性晤談方式進行訪談,以蒐集受試者對人際衝突情境的社會認知脈絡,包括受試者選用的線索、對情境的解釋、情感的標示、對他人的同理能力、想到的解決方法,及考慮到的後果等六個面向。研究者並發展出選用線索檢核、解決途徑及後果之數量計算與評價,及以質性資料進行叢聚分析的方法,歸納分析受測者在選用的線索、對情境的解釋、情感的標示、對他人的同理能力等方面的衡鑑結果。本研究所發展出的衡鑑工具,確實可區分社會性攻擊型、非社會性攻擊及一般學童在攻擊行為的社會認知歷程上的差異,適合運用於國小學童的攻擊行衡鑑,協助找出學童在社會認知歷程上的問題,提出正確的處遇措施,實值兒童輔導學界與實務工作者加以應用。
Based on the social-cognitive model, this study developed assessment instruments and methods that are suitable for children. There are three types of interpersonal conflict situations developed by researchers in this study: Verbal aggression, physical aggression and ambiguous aggression. Use clinical interview method with the interview guideline developed by researchers, clinical psychologist can understand the subjects six socilcognitive aspects of interpersonal conflict situation: Cue utilization, interpretation, affect-labeling, empathy, generate solutions, consider consequences. The situations of interpersonal coflict and the clinical interview guidelines developed by researchers of this study can clear discriminate the different results of social-cognitive assessment among the sociopathy aggressive children, the unsocialized aggressive children and normal children. It is a very nice instrument and method to assess high aggressive children to find out their deficient and destortive cognitions. According these assessment resoults, psychologist can delop validity interventions to help high aggressive children change their aggressive behaviors.