股東會未達定額數決議之效力－最高法院103年度第11次民事庭會議決議評論

The Resolution of Insufficient Quorum at the Meeting of Shareholders' Committee and its Effect-The Review Resolution on the 11th Civil Court Session of the Supreme Court, 2014

林大洋(Ta-Yang Lin)

《法令月刊》 65卷11期 (2014/11) Pp. 72-91

https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.2014.6511.03

摘要

股份有限公司股東會之決議，不論為普通決議或特別決議，依公司法之規定，均需符合該法所規定之「定額數」與「多數決」之要件。如股東會之決議係由未達定額數之股東出席所作成，其效力為何？實務之見解長期以來呈現分歧現象，且判例之見解與學說主流觀點背道而馳。最高法院最近經由民事庭會議對此問題作成決議，變更該院63年台上字第965號判例所持「得撤銷說」之立場，而改採「決議不成立說」之見解，使得此一長久以來重大之爭議問題，得以重新定調，深具意義。爰藉本文對其來龍去脈與轉折演變及決議之法源依據，加以評述。

關鍵字

股份有限公司 ； 決議不成立 ； 決議得撤銷 ； 公司治理 ； 普通決議

並列摘要

Co., Ltd. Shareholders' meeting resolution, whether as an ordinary resolution or special resolution, in accordance with the provisions of the Company Law, must meet the ＂fixed percentage＂ and ＂majority rule＂ under the requirements of the Law. If the resolution is made under the attendance of insufficient quorum at the meeting of shareholders' committee, is the resolution still effective? The court's practice has long been different; the opinions on precedents have been contrary from the main stream view on jurisprudence. The Supreme Court recently made resolutions during a Civil Court Session on this issue, revised the civil precedent No. 965 ＂the resolution may be withdrawn,＂ which wsa made in 1974, and instead adopted the new view of ＂the resolution may not stand.＂ This significant change re-set the tone of this long-term dispute. This article will discuss the evolution, source of law which the resolutions based upon, and comments on this issue.

並列關鍵字

Co. ； Ltd ； The Resolution does not Stand ； The Resolution is Withdrawn ； Corporate Governance ； Ordinary Resolution

參考文獻

王文宇(2003)。公司法論。臺北:元照。

王甲乙、楊建華、鄭健才(2008)。民事訴訟法新論。臺北:自版。

王泰升(1989)。從所有與經營分離論公開發行公司法制。臺北:蔚理。

王泰銓(1997)。公司法爭議問題。臺北:五南。

王泰銓(2009)。公司法新論。臺北:三民。