透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.190.159.10
  • 期刊

國中健康與體育學習領域教師評鑑初探

Evaluation of Health and Physical Education Teacher of Junior High School: A Preliminary Study

摘要


本研究目的在研究臺灣國中健康與體育學習領域教師評鑑內涵與指標,以期提供學校及教育行政主管機關,在擬定政策與執行之參考。研究方法是以自編之「國中健康與體育學習領域教師評鑑內涵」及「國中健康與體育學習領域教師評鑑指標」量表進行問卷調查,研究對象為972位臺灣本島各縣市國民中學校長、訓導(學務)主任、體衛或體育或衛生組長、體育或健康教育或健康與體育教師,使用之統計包括描述性統計、因素分析、Pearson積差相關、多元逐步廻歸。研究結果指出:一、本研究教師評鑑內涵計有9個向度,34項指標。本研究教師評鑑指標構成「層面─向度─指標」,計有4個層面,14個向度,69項指標。二、兩個量表相關性高。三、評鑑內涵所含括之評鑑的主要目的、平時準備階段項目、評鑑規劃階段項目、評鑑程序、評鑑結果應記載事項等向度較具預測力。本研究結論:本量表所發展的評鑑內涵及指標,透過適當的施測及合理的分析,具有可接受的信效度,能廣泛運用於該領域的測量,並作為未來臺灣研究國中健康與體育教師評鑑之參考與測量工具。

並列摘要


This study aimed to investigate the content and indicators in the field of health and physical education (PE) for Junior high school teachers in Taiwan so as to provide the reference for schools and educational administration organizations in policy-making and implementation. The self-designed teachers' evaluation content scale and teachers' evaluation indicators scale were used for the questionnaires. Nine hundred and seventy-two participants, including principals, director of student affairs, section chiefs of hygiene and PE, or teachers of health and PE were asked to fill out questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Pearson correlation, and multiple stepwise regression analysis. The results from this study were indicated as follow: 1. There are nine dimensions and thirty-four indicators in teachers' evaluation content. The teachers' evaluation frames are constructed by levels, dimensions and indicators, and containing four levels, fourteen dimensions and sixty-nine indicators. 2. Both scales of questionnaires were highly correlated. 3. Some categories in the teacher evaluations content such as ”the main purpose of the evaluation,” ”items of routine preparing stages,” ”items of evaluation planning stages,” ”evaluation procedures” and ”record items of evaluation results” were indicated higher predictability. In this study, the developed evaluation scales containing the content and indicators were conducted with appropriate procedures, and tested with high reliability and validity. It is concluded that the evaluation content and the indicators of the scale in this study can be used as a reference and applied to the teachers of the field of health and PE of junior high schools in Taiwan.

參考文獻


吳子宏(2003)。九年一貫健康與體育領域教師專業能力內涵之因素分析研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院體育學系。
吳政達(1999)。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究─模糊德菲術、模糊層級分析法與模糊綜合評估法之應用(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體 Amos 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。
李俊杰(2006)。國民小學體育教師課程決定之研究(博士論文)。國立體育學院體育研究所。
呂錘卿、林生傳(2001)。國民小學教師專業成長指標及現況之研究。教育學刊。17,45-64。

被引用紀錄


Ling, L. Y. (2011). 操場‧教具‧體育課─從運動場地標準化論臺灣與日本體育課教具使用情形之比較 [master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315250349

延伸閱讀