透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.163.31
  • 期刊

CDIO體育課程設計與傳統體育課程設計對大專生學習成效之比較

Comparison Between CDIO Physical Education Course Design and Traditional Physical Education Course Design of College Students' Learning Effectiveness

摘要


本研究之目的為檢驗conceive-design-implement-operate(CDIO)體育課程設計,對大學生自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入的成效。以立意取樣選取兩班學生共計110位進行不同課程設計,並以二因子混合設計變異數分析驗證研究目的(課程設計×前後測)。研究結果顯示:不同課程設計在自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入前後測結果皆達交互作用;進一步以單純主要效果分析發現,不同課程設計在3種學習成效前測無顯著差異;但在後測皆達顯著差異,顯示參與CDIO體育課程設計學生的自我導向學習、創意自我效能與學習投入優於傳統體育課程設計。本研究結論認為相較於傳統體育課程設計,CDIO體育課程設計確實能提升大學生運動知能以外的特質與能力,對學生未來課程學習有正向影響,建議大專體育教師可使用CDIO體育課程設計,介入部分課程安排,協助學生有多元的學習成效。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) physical education course design for college students' self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement. Two classes of a total of 110 students were selected for different course designs with purposive sampling, and two-factor mixed design variance analysis was used to verify the purpose of the study (course design × pre-test). The results showed that different course designs had an interactive effect on self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement on pretest-posttest results. Further analysis of the simple main effect found that there were no significant differences in the three pre-tests of self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement. However, there were significant differences in the post-test, indicating that the self-directed learning, creative self-efficacy, and learning engagement of students participating in CDIO physical education course design were better than those in the traditional physical education course design. In conclusion, this study found that, compared with traditional physical education course design, CDIO physical education course design could improve college students' traits and abilities other than sports knowledge, which has a positive impact on students' future curriculum study. The study recommends that college physical education teachers integrate the CDIO physical education course design to assist students to achieve multiple learning results.

參考文獻


王文宜、闕月清、周建智、吳志銘(2015)。問題導向學習介入護專生健康體適能教學計畫之成效。大專體育學刊,17 卷 2 期,154-168 頁。doi: 10.5297/ser.1702.004[Wang, W.-Y., Keh, N.-C., Chou, C.-C., & Wu, C.-M. (2015). Evaluation of teaching effectiveness of problem-based learning model on nursing college health physical fitness program. Sports & Exercise Research, 17(2), 154-168. doi: 10.5297/ ser.1702.004]
王亭文(2020)。CDIO 工程教育模式應用於大專體育課程的可行性。大專體育,154 期,1-11頁。doi: 10.6162/SRR.202009_(154).0001[Wang, T.-W. (2020). Feasibility of applying the CDIO engineering education framework to college physical education curriculum. Sports Research Review, 154, 1-11. doi: 10.6162/SRR.202009_(154).0001]
吳宛臻(2017)。動手做課程對高中生創造力影響之研究─以智高機器人為例。工業科技教育學刊,10 期,47-60 頁。doi: 10.6306/JITE.201711_(10).0004[Wu, W.-Z. (2017). The creativity of senior high students through hands-on teaching project of Gigo Robot activities. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 10, 47-60. doi: 10.6306/JITE.201711_(10).0004]
周建智(2011)。運動促進學童之創造力。學校體育,123 期,31-36 頁。doi: 10.29937/PES.2011 04.0006[Chou, C.-C. (2011). Sports promote the creativity in school children. Physical Education of School, 123, 31-36. doi: 10.29937/PES.201104.0006]
洪久賢、蔡長艷、楊婷棋、蕭漢良、劉志興、鐘鈺鈞(2018)。觀光餐旅創造性問題解決教學之成效研究。課程與教學,21卷1期,191-221頁。doi: 10.6384/CIQ.201801_21(1).0008[Horng, J.-S., Tsai, C.-Y., Yang, T.-C., Hsiao, H.-L., Liu, C.-H., & Chung, Y.-C. (2018). Effects of creative problem solving strategies instruction on tourism and hospitality undergraduate students. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 21(1), 191-221. doi: 10.6384/CIQ.201801_21(1).0008]

被引用紀錄


謝文偉、陳建廷(2023)。STEAM素養融入籃球投籃教學對大學生學習成效之影響中原體育學報(20),59-74。https://doi.org/10.6646/CYPEJ.202307_(20).0006

延伸閱讀