透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.107.161
  • 期刊

普通學生與閱讀障礙學生之單位詞、識字、詞彙和閱讀理解能力之比較研究

A Comparison of Classifiers, Word Recognition, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension of the 3rd Graders without and with Reading Disability

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在發展一份適用於國小三年級學生之單位詞測驗,初步分析普通學生和閱讀障礙學生之單位詞能力發展概況,以比較兩者之間的差異,並進而探討單位詞、識字、詞彙與閱讀理解能力的相關。為達上述目的,本研究以南縣某一國小三年級學生為研究對象,其結果如下:1.國小三年級學生之單位詞測驗具有良好的信效度。2.普通學生和閱讀障礙學生在單位詞測驗上之得分,有顯著的差異;而兩組學生分別在「分類詞」、「量詞」與「動詞單位詞」三類別之得分並無顯著差異,可將三類別視為同一種單位詞能力。3.普通學生在單位詞、識字、多向度詞彙與閱讀理解測驗上之表現的相關是很相近的;而閱讀障礙學生在單位詞測驗與識字測驗上之表現的相關並不同於單位詞測驗與多向度詞彙測驗和閱讀理解測驗上之表現的相關。4.兩組學生在單位詞測驗上填寫的錯誤答案有許多相似之處,但錯誤出現次數則有差異,其錯誤組型可分為語義混淆、用法混淆、事物分類概念混淆與不明錯誤四種。5.依照閱讀障礙學生在各項測驗上的表現分為識字較優組、單位詞能力較優組、閱讀理解能力較優組、多向度詞彙能力較優組及各項能力皆差組五種亞型。本研究並針對研究結果,提出對未來研究、教學與評量的建議。

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were first to develop the classifiers test battery for 3rd graders, and secondly to compare the classifiers competence that relate to word recognition, vocabulary, and reading comprehension of the 3rd graders with and without reading disability.The main findings of this research were stated as follows:1. These classifiers tests possess acceptable reliability and validity.2. There were significant differences between the 3rd graders with and without reading disability in the scores of classifiers test. Also, to find normal students have significantly intra-individual differences.3. The scores of classifiers test and word recognition, vocabulary, and reading comprehension of the 3rd graders without reading disability were relevant. However, the relationship scores of classifiers test and word recognition were not similar to the relationship scores of classifiers test and vocabulary, and reading comprehension of the 3rd graders with reading disability.4. There were similarities between the 3rd graders with and without reading disability in error patterns. But two groups have significant differences in error frequencies. The distinguishing error patterns for using classifiers could be divided into four types.5. The 3rd graders with reading disability could be further divided into five subtypes based on their test scores of classifiers, word recognition, vocabulary, and reading comprehension.

參考文獻


方金雅(2001)。多向度詞彙評量與教學之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。
王英君(2000)。國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
吳武典、張正芬(1984)。國語文能力測驗之編製及相關研究。測驗年刊。31,37-52。
吳淑娟(2001)。國小閱讀理解困難學童之詞彙能力分析研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
吳謹瑋(1993)。中文失語症病人量詞研究(碩士論文)。清華大學語言學研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


郭玥妦(2009)。引導式閱讀策略融入網路讀書會於提升國小五年級閱讀素養成效之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.01267
張毓仁(2014)。成人與小六學童在中文多義詞語意激發和選擇的比較〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512010476

延伸閱讀