權力與課程決定之研究：以一所國小課程發展委員會為例

本研究以南臺灣一所國民小學為研究對象，採用個案研究法，以訪談法、文件分析等方式蒐集資料，探究個案學校在校本課程決定過程中，課發會成員的權力運用與權力互動情形。研究結論為：1.多數課發會成員未覺察到具有校本課程主題與內涵的課程決定權，課發會成員需理解課程發展使命、持續提升專業知能，始能有效發揮課程決定權力；2.個案學校的校本課程主題與內涵的產生皆出於單向權力運作，除了影響後續的課程實踐，亦難以呈現應有的課程品質；3.課程領導者應了解教師在校本課程發展過程中遭遇的困難與真正需求，以利協助課發會成員建構出完備的校本課程；4.校本課程主題與內涵須透過課發會成員在權力共享基礎上凝聚共識，歷經充分專業對話，形構嚴謹完備的課程知識。最後，依據研究發現與結論，提出建議，供學校作為發展課程實務之參考。

關鍵字

權力；課程決定；課程發展委員會

並列摘要

This study takes a national elementary school in southern Taiwan as the research object, adopts the case study method, collects data by means of interviews, document analysis, etc., and explores the power use and power interaction of the members of the curriculum development committee in the course decision process of the case school . The research conclusions are as follows: 1. Most members of the curriculum development committee are unaware of the curriculum decision-making power with the theme and connotation of the school-based curriculum. They need to understand the mission of curriculum development and continuously improve their professional knowledge in order to exert their curriculum decision-making power.2.The school-based curriculum themes and connotations of the case school are produced by one-way power operation. In addition to affecting the follow-up curriculum practice, it is also difficult to present the proper curriculum quality. 3. Curriculum leaders should understand the difficulties and real needs of teachers in the process of school-based curriculum development, so as to assist curriculum development committee members to construct a complete school-based curriculum. 4. The theme and connotation of the school-based curriculum must be based on power-sharing among the members of the curriculum development meeting to build a consensus, and through full professional dialogue, to form a rigorous and complete curriculum knowledge. Finally, based on research findings and conclusions, propose suggestions for schools to use as a reference for developing curriculum practices.

並列關鍵字

power ； curriculum decision ； curriculum development committee

參考文獻

吳清山（2012）。回歸教育專業的課程決定。師友月刊，545(3)，37-41。http://doi.org/10.6437/EM.201211.0037 [Wu, C.-S. (2012). Return to the curriculum decision of professional education. The Educator Monthly, 545(3), 37-41. http://doi.org/10.6437/EM.201211.0037]

李子建（2003）。學校本位課程的發展：理論與取向。課程與教學季刊，6(3)，105-128。http://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200307.0105 [Lee, C.-K.(2003). School-based Curriculum Development: Theories and Approaches. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 6 (3), 105-128. http://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200307.0105]

周淑卿（2001）。課程決定的賦權迷思――集中化與離中化的探討。教育研究集刊，47，91-106。http://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200107_(47).0005 [Chou, S.-C.(2001). The myth of teacher empowerment in curriculum decision-making-A discussion on centralization and decentralization. Bulletin of Educational Research, 47, 141, 120-132. http://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200107_(47).0005]

林岱樵（2016）。以傅柯權力關談網球雙打的權力現象。運動文化研究，29，7-28。http://doi.org/10.29818/SS.201612_(29).0001 [Lin, D.-C (20156). On the Power Phenomenon of Tennis Doubles Game Reexamined with Foucault’s Power Concept. Journal of Sport Culture, 29, 7-28. http://doi.org/10.29818/SS.201612_(29).0001]

林淑芳（2004）。論傅柯權力與主體。人文及社會科學集刊，16(1)，117-159。http://doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.200403.0117 [Lin, S.-F. (2004). Michel Foucault on Power and Subject. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 16(1), 117159. http://doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.200403.0117]

主題瀏覽